Where do classical vinyl records get their rumble from?


Recently converted back to vinyl from silver disks, I am struck by how much rumble seems to be inherent in the new and used vinyl I am buying.

A case in point, is a recent Deutsche Grammophon (DG) recording (487 7484) of Mahler’s Second Symphony made at a live performance at the Sydney Opera House (I was there).  The first set I bought was amongst the dirtiest pressings I have ever had, but the second set was much improved.  However, there is a persistent rumble whether played on my Holbo Mk2 air bearing system or my venerable Garrard 301 (new bearing from Classic Turntable Company).

Mahler typically has huge dynamic range, from muted off-stage performers to hundreds of musicians going hell-for-leather.

The rumble could be partly caused by the venue’s air conditioning system, but I hear similar background on a Telarc recording (Stereo 10051) of Saint Saens Organ Symphony made in Philadelphia.  Telarc even arranged to have local roads shut down for the recording sessions.

Similar efforts were made by DG when recording the organ at Notre Dame in Paris, where recording was done late at night to reduce traffic noise.  My copy includes Dolby Atmos on Pure-Audio Bly-ray (DG 486 1466).

I was beginning to think the rumble was inherent in my tables, but then I played a German Direct Metal Mastered (DMM) set from In-Akustik for Clearaudio’s 40th anniversary (INAK 78051 2LP).  It includes some Telarc tracks.  This set has the quietest background I’ve never heard.  There is virtually no rumble, exonerating my tables.

So apart from the recoding venue’s air conditioning and traffic noise, why do so many classical records seem to have built-in rumble?  Could it be from the mastering lathe?

I am really only thinking about classical recordings where the dynamic range approximates the signal to noise ratio of vinyl, meaning that very low-level signals are musically important, while simultaneously bumping against the noise floor.

richardbrand

I have many original DG pressings of classical music that I purchased new in the 70s and 80s.  In those days DG was thought of as a quality company but there were characteristics of their work that I found wanting. Namely, they often tended to be shrill and glazed over especially on crescendos.  One bought their LPs regardless, mainly because of the high level musicianship and worldwide reputations of the orchestras they recorded. I don't recall a noise I could characterize as "rumble", but in those days my equipment probably couldn't reproduce what RB is describing. I have not auditioned my DG LPs in a decade or more. I will break some out and have a listen.

@lewm 

Completely agree that Deutsche Grammophon was highly regarded back in the day.  Herbert von Karajan was fastidious about the sound of his recordings, and the Berliner Philharmoniker under his leadership developed a particularly full sound.

Then DG and the orchestra went their separate ways, with the orchestra establishing its own label and usually recording in their home venue, which has been fully equipped for recording live concerts.  This enterprise is branded "The Digital Concert Hall" and includes permanent remote cameras which can be pre-programmed.  Outputs include webcasts, Blu-ray video productions, Pure Audio Blu-ray and SACD backed up by CDs.

Other orchestras have followed, one good example being the London Symphony Orchestra with its LSO Live label routinely producing SACDs of live concerts.

Decca is another recording company with famous recording quality which has become something of a bit player, where it sits as a sister company to DG in the Universal Music Group portfolio.  Decca has some superb recent recordings on CD but their vinyl equivalents have been marred by unacceptable scratches caused by high-gloss, printed inner linings, at least as delivered to me by Presto.

The DG recording of Mahler 2 mentioned in my original post was a live recording of a big-deal live event - the re-opening of the Sydney Opera House Concert Hall after a 3-year, A$100-m refit, done mainly to improve the venue's sound quality.  The concert was broadcast live on national radio and recorded using 15 cameras for a national TV broadcast.  It was also webcast.

So it is disappointing that DG's Australian vinyl pressing has oversized centre holes.  My first copy rivalled Decca's worst for dirt.  I don't know whether DG or the Australian Broadcasting Corporation was responsible for the original recording.  It may even have been the Trust, or the Sydney Symphony Orchestra! 

It was a special occasion for a special building, and the performance was comparable to Rattle's best.

@richardbrand 

"...their systems, including tables, are simply not resolving enough to hear what I report.  Alternatively, the noise floor of their listening environments could be so high that it masks the effects."

These are just a few of my faves;

Clifford Curzon - Beethoven "Emperor" Concerto No. 5 in E flat for piano and orchestra, The Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra, Hans Knappertsbusch, Decca Stereo 1958

Georg Solti - Beethoven Symphony No. 9 , Lorengar, Milton, Burrows, Tavela with the Chicago Symphony Orchestra and Chorus, Decca Silver Jubilee Recording Stereo 1972

Bruno Walter - Beethoven Symphony No. 6 in F major opus 68 Pastoral Columbia Symphony Orchestra Stereo 1958

Gyorgy Sebok, Janos Starker - Johannes Brahms Sonatas for Cello and Piano E minor opus 38 and F major opus 99, Mercury Living Presence Stereo 1964

Antal Dorati, Janos Starker - Dvorak Violoncello Concerto in B minor Opus 104 Bruch Kol Nidrei Opus 47 London Symphony Orchestra, Mercury Living Presence Stereo 1962

My equipment will out resolve any thing you’ve got and no rumble. So where do you live? In the Outback?

 

 

@faustuss 

Recording technology has come a long way in the last 50 years. 

I am glad you have no rumble.  I believe you posted elsewhere that you have no surface noise either.  You have a truly miraculous system.

Of course, none of the works you cite contains the dynamic range of a Mahler symphony and these days vinyl has digital to compete with.

@richardbrand 

"Recording technology has come a long way in the last 50 years. 

I am glad you have no rumble.  I believe you posted elsewhere that you have no surface noise either.  You have a truly miraculous system.

Of course, none of the works you cite contains the dynamic range of a Mahler symphony and these days vinyl has digital to compete with."

Yes, and any half-baked argument will do won’t it Richard, especially when you deliberately take my statements out of context. I’ve commented extensively about handling vinyl and simple, inexpensive methods of cleaning records elsewhere in the forum that you deliberately ignore but only focus on the ones that really don’t bolster what you’re disputing in the moment. You mention advancements in recording technology when you preface this thread on a recent Deutsche Grammophon recording that by your accounts contains rumble and I just simply pointed out multiple examples of very old ones that don’t. Anyone can read the inconstancies in your incongruent arguments. Why is digital suddenly a fallback position when we are discussing vinyl? Also, attacks on my spelling and grammar? Hm?

I will go on to say that yes there are advancements such as superior stylus profiles over the biradial elliptical which tracks very close to the surface of the record much like a spherical where most of the groove imperfections are and it’s only real advantage is it’s ability to resolve high frequency information slightly better but is just as susceptible to pick up surface noise as well. Line contacts, Micro lines and Micro ridge ride deeper and contact more pristine groove surface significantly reducing noise.

The bulk of the noise that accumulates on vinyl over time is the result of lackadaisical handling and improper hygiene. Record noise and wear are not an absolute and there are countless examples of vinyl’s permanence as a sound storage medium dating back to it’s beginnings in the late 1940s. I believe I’ve said this elsewhere too.

You want to hear dynamic range then get a copy of this Buddy Rich - Just In Time - The Final Recording on Gear Box records. Buddy has a very long solo on the third disc that perfectly demonstrates dynamic range and the incredible low noise floor vinyl is capable of in a live setting!