@audphile1
You are the most classless person I’ve ever encountered on a forum. Downright insulting, extremely rude, and pretentious, with an overwhelming desire to have the moral high ground, even though it doesn’t belong to you.
@frank009 that guy’s dead. As dead as your brain cells.
you must be some lonely schmuck who still lives in his mother’s basement. Alone. Not even the “idiot” wife that “mistakes 10 to 15 mistakes a day” anywhere within the vicinity. Mommy brings you microwaved lunch so you don’t get disrupted from your trolling here
Real mature. This is not how adults talk. I wonder how you function in every day life at all... talking about my mother, living in my mom’s basement? Buddy, I am very well off financially. If we ever met in person you would probably run away like a wimp. You seem to hide behind a profile photo that isn’t you and a persona where you are an authority on audio, when you are the polar opposite. I could say life would be pretty lousy living as you, and I’d probably be right.
@kennyc
You are not living in 2026. You are stuck in the 1970s. I suggest you read textbooks about audio reproduction, and grow up. And... accept the reality that technology has advanced rapidly since you started your audiophile journey vs today. In addition, you seem to have a totally incomplete understanding of audio as a subject of study. I find your responses to be both immature and primitive.
5 MB harddrive being shipped by IBM - 1956. : r/OldSchoolCool
And given how fast computers have evolved (AI, graphics cards, CPUs, storage) you’re telling me that audio electronics has been moving at a turtle’s pace since its inception, and we still can’t get close to perfect audio reproduction? Well then, you are hilariously wrong.
transistors, DAC chips, and other parts have followed the same process -
Miniaturization - Wikipedia
Nyquist Sampling Theorem - GeeksforGeeks
it’s really that simple. The modern world is supported by this; which without we’d still be in the stone age technologically. Have a nice day.