Mcintosh has been contentious in hifi circles for decades. I think it started in the seventies. One of the biggest gurus in the hifi publishing world (maybe Julian Hirsch?) panned a Mcintosh in a review and Mcintosh took strong exception. The argument escalated until Mcintosh kind of ended it by retreating from the stereo publishing world, pulling all advertising from stereo mags and not providing any equipment for review. For several years there was zero mention of Macintosh in any of the hifi magazines-at least in the US. You would find full-page ads in Esquire and ads in Popular Science but none in HIFI, Stereo Review, or Audio magazines.
With no mention in the major publications, information about Macintosh in the audio circles was largely rumour-based and word of mouth, resulting in a reputation that the brand was expensive and not really high end but was aimed at well-heeled folks like doctors and lawyers who wanted showpiece equipment to impress their friends.
It wasn't until the 1990s that Macintosh started reappearing in reviews and ads in the publications, with consistent high marks by the reviewers. And, even though I have not seen a poor review, the stigma kind of still hangs on in some people's minds today.
I can't really speak to your comment about lack of mention in today's articles as I really haven't read hifi magazines for a few years now but my impression is that Macintosh is currently a well respected brand with a strong following.
My Mac gear is now over a quarter-century old and still going strong.
Bill

