When I read the comments on ASR, I start thinking that there is a bit of indoctrination into a measurement cult going on.
To each his own and I think each group is happy in their own way.
Amir of ASR admitted 1 cable sounded better than the other. NOT CLICKBAIT
There is a recent thread inquiring about the Puritan PSM156, and someone lead to another product the Niagara 1200. Long story short. I come across a review of Amir admitting the "Generic" cable sound better than the Audioquest chain.
If 1 cable can sound better than another, and Amir has admitted to it. Is there really anything left to discuss except that we have been right all along?
Proof: Go to the "Listening Test" of the review.
@yyzsantabarbara ASR is a funny bunch, they’re all about the data, the measurements, the objectiveness. But whenever a new product comes out, they eagerly wait for user subjective experience. Hello? What are they expecting. Another laughable aspect is, in their world, all the products have exceeded the hearing threshold, every measurements have entered the inaudible zone. All the Topping products for example. What’s the point of a new Topping DAC, a more expensive one, that also exceeds the audible zone. Hello? Are they expecting something new? |
Amir ? Well, he is weird, bordering on Psychotic and too easily accuses one of spamming then bans you no apeal which is really OK as then you can just ignore him |
@ned1000 I lost a few precious IQ pts reading through your segment. But I read it, and it is unfortunate. However, you have also admitted yourself that the Coat-hanger sounds better than $10k AQ cables. The entire premise of ASR, measurement cults, and Amir have always been, cables measure the same, they sound the same. 2 very important points. Now we have you and Amir admitting that 2 cables sound different if the cheaper is superior. The cheaper part is not important, what’s important is that 1 cable sounds superior than the other. I think there’s nothing left to discuss. |