1. Home
  2. analog
  3. 198201-120528

Discourse on Grading Vinyl...why sellers need to Play Grade!!!

Vinyl records are, at their core, an audio medium—not a visual one. Yet for decades, a large portion of record grading has relied heavily, sometimes exclusively, on visual inspection. While visual grading can offer a quick and convenient assessment, it is fundamentally limited and often misleading. If the goal of grading is to communicate how a record will actually sound, then play grading is not just preferable—it is essential.

The central flaw of visual grading lies in the assumption that what you see corresponds reliably to what you hear. In practice, this simply isn’t true. A record can appear pristine—glossy, free of obvious scratches, and well cared for—yet produce persistent surface noise, crackle, or distortion during playback. These issues can stem from groove wear caused by poorly aligned cartridges, excessive tracking force, or repeated plays on low-quality equipment. None of this damage is necessarily visible to the naked eye, but it is immediately obvious when the stylus hits the groove.

Conversely, a record that looks cosmetically flawed may play surprisingly well. Light surface marks, paper scuffs, or sleeve rash often have little to no audible impact. A visually graded record might be downgraded unfairly, depriving potential buyers of a perfectly enjoyable listening experience. This disconnect highlights a key truth: visual grading measures appearance, while play grading measures performance.

Another critical issue is subjectivity. Visual grading depends heavily on lighting conditions, experience, and even personal bias. What one seller considers “Near Mint,” another might label “Very Good Plus.” Without playback confirmation, these judgments are inherently inconsistent. Play grading, while not entirely free of subjectivity, anchors the evaluation in something concrete—the actual sound. It answers the only question that truly matters to a listener: “How does it play?”

From a buyer’s perspective, the difference is not trivial. Collectors and audiophiles are not purchasing vinyl to admire it under a lamp; they are buying it to hear music. A visually graded record carries an element of risk—sometimes minor, sometimes significant. A play-graded record, on the other hand, offers transparency. It reflects real-world performance on a turntable, giving the buyer confidence that expectations will match reality.

There is also an ethical dimension. Sellers who rely solely on visual grading—especially when dealing in higher-value records—shift the burden of uncertainty onto the buyer. This can lead to disappointment, disputes, and a general erosion of trust in the marketplace. Play grading, while more time-consuming, demonstrates a higher standard of care and accountability. It signals that the seller values accuracy over convenience.

Of course, practical constraints exist. Play grading every record in a large inventory requires time, proper equipment, and a controlled listening environment. For bulk sellers or low-value records, this may not always be feasible. However, this does not diminish the principle—it simply highlights a trade-off between efficiency and reliability. Where accuracy matters—rare pressings, audiophile editions, or premium pricing—play grading should be the norm, not the exception.

Ultimately, vinyl is about sound. Grooves exist to be read by a stylus, not inspected by an eye. Any grading system that prioritizes visual appearance over audible reality is, at best, incomplete and, at worst, misleading. Play grading aligns the evaluation process with the true purpose of the medium.

It transforms grading from a guess based on looks into a direct assessment of performance.

If the aim is honesty, consistency, and respect for the listener, then play grading isn’t just a better method—it’s the right one.
 

voodoofunk
allenf1963
472 posts
 

@jr1000 

I agree with you wholeheartedly about the Used Vinyl clusterf**ck that's going on right now.  The greed of "flippers" is ruining it for the young people trying to actually listen to vinyl, with ridiculous prices being charged because something is old.  If I see the word "Vintage" slapped on another product to jack up prices I'm going to go postal.

 

In addition, you have the under-35 Gen Whatever crowd who are treating vinyl like Sports Cards, Pokémon Cards, and NFT's -- as investment commodities that are supposed to be sealed up and displayed on the wall like art work instead of played on a turntable.  I've actually overheard conversations at a used record store where 20-somethings admitted they didn't actually "own" a turntable, but had a portfolio of vinyl.  They were giddy because their "Blizzard of Oz" and "Diary of a Madman" albums had skyrocketed in price because Ozzy died.  Gone are the days when you could walk into a used vinyl shop with a $20 bill,  browse through the multiple bins, and walk out with 4 or 5 discs to add to your collection -- sometimes more if the $1 bin was good to you.  Nowadays, you're lucky to get 1 record and a little change for $20. 

 

Because of the current high prices, I try to help the younger generation out in a way that gives me immense satisfaction.   As I'm browsing at my primary used vinyl shop, I look at the other customers as I'm there.  If I see a kid going through the older rock section, I'll ask them what kind of music they like and what bands they listen to.  When I see an album that I think they'd like, I'll buy it and surprise them by giving it to them.  Usually I can find something that's less than $7 -- I pay that for a pint of Guinness and don't think anything of it.  The album will last a lot longer.  Last week, a teen was there with his dad and he said he liked the guitar sounds of 1970's bands.  I had seen a pristine copy of Robin Trower's "Bridge of Sighs" for $6...a no brainer.  The kid acted like Santa had just dropped down the chimney.  Even the dad was excited because he hadn't heard the album.  It's a great way to "Pay It Forward".

 

Enjoy the music!

 

jacklynn's avatar
jacklynn
28 posts
 

I love the idea of buying a record for a young person in a store.Pay it Forward.Brilliant.

audio-b-dog's avatar
audio-b-dog
777 posts
 

One warning about new albums. Past 1980, most of their contents have been stored digitally, and I can hear the difference. A lot on some records. So beware. I know some of your are chatgbt wary, but I now discuss albums with chatgbt before purchasing them. By giving it pressing numbers, sometimes what's printed on the dead wax, it can often tell me how the environment in which the album was recorded, engineers, miking, etc. Also if the contents have come from a digital or analogue source. Most reissues come from a digital source.

I purchased Roberta Flack's "First Take" around 1970. Before I knew anything about anything about audio. I have no idea what cartridges it was played on. Cheap ones in the beginning. Anyway, i beat that album up pretty badly. It hasn't been easy finding a mint minus copy. I've sent several back.

A seller I trust sent me a mint minuus copy and right in the first cut the background noise was worse than the First Take I'd gotten rid of. Without great expectations, I threw it in my Degritter and ran it through twice in a row. When cleaned, it was perfect. The seller I purchased it from sells albums above $1,000. You'd think they would clean their expensive albums before shipping them out to buyers.

russwill
55 posts
 

I used to manage a record store. I bought and sold records on visual inspection. Sometimes in some one's home but,mostly at our store. It took some of my staff a little while to pick up the knack. Being a vinyl person with lots of experience going in I had no problems. I had very few albums that were less than what I expected after visual inspection. 

Yes, you can encounter an odd duck occasionally. When we did we would negotiate a price or give a refund. This was very seldom. If you get good lighting and take your time you can tell which ones are bad. Visual inspection is the only way in a retail environment to evaluate collections quickly. Most of the time the seller wanted it over quick and so did I. Usually we would be busy and the customer didn't want to leave them. In dealing with other stores and collectors visual inspection was the accepted process.

I even was expert witness in a divorce settlement in court under oath. The other sides attorney asked me if I had played them. I told them I performed a visual inspection and it was the standard procedure. Not only was that accepted but, the collection was given the value I had appraised them at.

So I get the premise but, no one has time in the retail world anyway to listen to every album. I never got burned on an album that I paid a good amount for. Just look them over carefully in good light.

 

bdp24's avatar
bdp24
10,487 posts
 

 

While it is certainly true that visual grading of LPs in subjective, so is play grading. Not just the audio quality of the equipment used to listen to the records, but the experience and standards of the person doing the listening and grading. On Discogs I buy only records graded Near Mint or better, and even then a number of them have arrived in far worse condition than what I consider to be Near Mint. You would think Near Mint would be subjective-free, but nope.

Most of my used LP buying is done in person. If you know what to look for, a visual inspection under bright light can reveal the condition of the groove on each side of the LP (a worn groove becomes grayish in color).

 

More to discover