Thanks for responding. I’ve seen comments in reviews that say the DAC 200 has exceptional abilities to convert DSD files. Unfortunately, I don’t currently have the ability to provide DSD data.
I am looking to upgrade from a 30+ year old Krell Studio DAC. People assure me that any modern DAC will blow away my old Krell. I hope they are correct, but the Krell is sounding pretty darn good right now. I’ve had 2 goals on upgrading my system, real subwoofers and a modern DAC. The REL T/9x’s are installed in the good system. I thought I had done a good job optimizing my digital playback to provide high level detail. But replacing my old home theater sub with the RELs has even improved on that level of clarity. The dealer who sold the RELs offered the T+A evaluation. Since I brought home 2 pieces of equipment, I am introducing them stepwise. The T+A DAC 200 is burning in through my secondary system which is built around 52 year old speakers I bought when I was in college. Those old Marantz speakers have never sounded this good. At this time, I have 45 hours of time on the T+A. My plan was for 100 hours of burn in, but I am getting anxious to swap out the Krell.
The T+A DAC 200 will need to do a better job converting PCM files from my CD collection for me to complete the purchase. I trust the reviews saying that if/when I decide to access DSD files that I’ll enjoy it even more.
My evaluation will be based on the fixed output. I have a Rowland preamp that has been the foundation of my system for 30 years. It’s great at both analog and line level preamplification. If I decide to keep the T+A, I’ll give it a try as a preamp. I haven’t seen any comments in the reviews about the DAC 200’s qualities as a preamp. If the T+A outperforms the Rowland, I can use it directly to my amps and use the Rowland as a phono preamp.
I’ve been beating myself up over these upgrades for about 3 years. I believe I’ve watched just about every audio review on YouTube over that time. Pretty exciting getting around to making the upgrades.


