DAC Shootout: Doge 7 vs Gustard R26 vs Holo Audio Cyan 2


Please post your comments/experiences.

DAC Shootout: Doge 7 vs Gustard R26 vs Holo Audio Cyan 2 

After several years with the Doge 7 tubed DAC as my reference, two serious contenders arrived on the same day: the Gustard R26 and Holo Audio Cyan 2—both modern R2R ladder DACs. What followed was a deep A/B comparison across two very different systems, and the result is clear: 

There is no single “best” DAC here—only the best DAC for a given system. 

Method: 

Equipment: Doge was labelled DAC #1, Holo Cyan was Dac #2, Gustard R26 Dac #3. 

All three DACs were tested in my two main reference systems. Sources were Eversolo T8 streamer transport, Eversolo DMP-A6 Streamer/Dac all-in-one, and Krell MD-20 CD transport. 

Used both coax and AES XLR connections for source OUT and DAC IN.   

Test Method: All DAC comparisons were done via near-simultaneous A/B testing.  

Some were blind to eliminate bias.  

After equipment warmup, compared system sound on various music selections using A/B switching between two DACs at a time, alternating listening with preamp source selector.  

Although somewhat arbitrary (my ears, my systems, my rooms, and my very familiar music choices), DAC differences were easily discernable.  

For each DAC pairing, a winner resulted. The overall winner in that system was selected after comparing the two best sounding DACs in that system.  

Later in the testing, the T8 and DMP-A6 changed places but DAC rankings  were almost the same. 

Systems used for evaluation 

System #1: Audio Research/B&W all‑tube “analog” system 

  • Electronics: Audio Research Corp SP-11 tube 2-chassis preamplifier and ARC VT-100 MKIII Power amplifier vacuum tube electronics 

  • Speakers: Bowers & Wilkins Matrix 801 S2 (1990) 

  • Streamer: Eversolo T8 (swapped with Eversolo DMP-A6 later in test) 

  • Vinyl: Empire 598 vintage turntable with Stanton 681 EE cartridge  

  • Cables: Cardas Golden Reference RCA interconnects.  

Cardas Golden Hexlink 5C Biwire Speaker Cables 

  • System Power: 100 Watts RMS per channel 

  • Room: 14 x 12 feet Fully carpeted 

  • Character: Powerful, Warm, spacious, organic, classic tube presentation 

System #2: Mark Levinson/Martin-Logan Summit solid‑state “precision” system 

  • Electronics: Mark Levinson No 38 preamp and No 23 Power Amp Solid‑state electronics 

  • Speakers: Martin-Logan Summit 

  • Streamer: Eversolo DMP‑A6 Gen 1 (swapped with Eversolo T8 later in test) 

  • CD: Krell MD‑20 CD transport 

  • Cables: Kimber Select XLR interconnects. Kimber Bifocal L Biwire speaker cables. 

  • System Power: 200 Watts RMS per channel for ESL panel (mids and highs), 200 watts RMS per channel for dual powered woofer. 400 wpc total. 

  • Room: 18 x 14 feet Bare wood floors with large wool area rug and leather furniture. Several drapes behind system and acoustic panels added for wall treatment 

  • Character: Crystal clear, slightly analytical and revealing 

RESULTS of LISTENING SESSIONS 

DAC 1: Doge 7 (Tubed DAC) 

System 1 (ARC/B&W tubes): The Doge 7 has been my long‑term reference in system #1 for a reason. It sounds alive like analog music, very close to vinyl sound. 

  • Sound: 

  • Smooth, spacious, rich, and analog‑like 

  • Wide and deep soundstage 

  • Warm, liquid presentation 

  • When I swapped in the Eversolo DMP-A6, (which sounds lighter and brighter than the T8), the Doge 7 shined and tamed the brightness with an analog smoothness. Took 1st chair with the DMP-A6 in this system. 

 

  • System synergy: 

  • Excellent analog smoothness. Soundstage was wide and deep and natural sounding, like a good MM phono cartridge. 

  • Weaknesses: 

  • Compared to the Holo, some spatial cues and fine detail are blurred 

  • Slightly softer bass definition 

System 2 (ML solid‑state): 

  • Here, the Doge fell apart: 

  • Sounded blurred, muddy, and out of place 

  • Lacked precision and control compared to the R26 and Cyan 2 

  • Build : 

  • Massive, heavy chassis 

  • Excellent metal remote 

  • Feels like classic high‑end gear 

Best match: 

  • Tube‑based, analog‑voiced systems where warmth and flow matter more than ultimate precision. 

DAC 2: Holo Audio Cyan 2  

System 1 (ARC/B&W tubes): This is where the Cyan 2 shined brightest—and narrowly edged out the Doge. 

  • Sound: 

  • Effervescent, engaging, sunny, inviting, emotional, and musical 

  • Music pours out like a warm liquid flood 

  • Analog‑like presentation, but with significantly more clarity than the Doge 

  • Wide and deep soundstage, with many spatial cues and nuances the Doge glosses over 

  • Mids and highs: Never overbright—Goldilocks “just right” 

  • Bass: Impactful and tighter than the Doge 

  • When I swapped in the Eversolo DMP-A6 (which sounds lighter and brighter than the T8), the Holo became too much of a good thing=too over bright. 

  • System synergy: 

  • In this tube system, the Cyan 2 was the most emotionally engaging and complete DAC of the three. Overall, it reminded me of a good quality MC phono cartridge. 

System 2 (ML solid‑state): 

  • The Cyan 2 sounded: 

  • Detailed, but smaller and more polite vs Gustard 

  • Less dynamic and less authoritative than the Gustard 

  • Didn’t energize the system the way the R26 did 

  • Result: Finished second here, behind the Gustard. 

 

  • Build:  

Heavy and solid for its size, well‑constructed. The smallest of the three DACs 

Best match: 

  • Tube systems or systems voiced for warmth and musicality where you want analog feel plus modern clarity. 

DAC 3: Gustard R26  

System 1 (ARC/B&W tubes): 

  • The R26 came across as: 

  • Darker tonally vs Holo and Doge. 

  • More detailed than the Doge, but with a slight glare or hardness that I did not find compelling 

  • Less emotionally engaging than the Holo 

  • Result: Finished third in this system. 

System 2 (ML solid‑state): This is where the Gustard R26 took the crown. 

  • Sound: 

  • Solid, huge bass foundation 

  • Large, authoritative stage presence 

  • Many spatial cues and strong imaging 

  • Slightly dark with a bit of bass emphasis, but overall the best match of the three 

  • System synergy: 

  • The R26 locked in with the ML system, delivering weight, scale, and control. 

 

  • Note: During testing, replaced System 2 Eversolo DMP-A6 streamer with borrowed Eversolo T8 from my tube system. Big improvement: Bass was tighter and less boomy. Soundstage deepened and imaging tightened. Buying a second T8 now! 

  • Best match: 

Solid‑state, precision‑oriented systems where you want bass authority, scale, and control. DAC parameters set to MID and NOS ON 

  • Build: Heavy and well‑built for its size 

 

Eversolo DMP‑A6 streamer with internal DAC (reference point) 

System 2 (ML solid‑state): 

Sounded: 

  • Nicely detailed 

  • Fairly well-balanced top to bottom 

  • But lighter weight, brighter, less bass foundation, smaller soundstage and less dynamic than the three external DACs 

 

  • Conclusion: Very competent but outclassed by the dedicated T8 streamer and DACs in scale and impact. Soundstage had less depth, more like looking at a flat picture of the outside world while Vs Eversolo T8 and Gustard was more like looking out an actual window into the real world. 

Pros and cons summary 

Doge 7 

  • Pros: 

  • Rich, smooth, analog‑like sound 

  • Wide, deep soundstage 

  • Massive, heavy build 

  • Excellent metal remote 

  • Sound can be tailored to taste with tube rolling. 

  • 2 coax inputs 

  • Front panel volume knob and headphone jack 

  • Cons: 

  • Can sound blurred and muddy in highly resolving solid‑state systems 

  • Less detailed and less precise than the Holo and Gustard 

Holo Audio Cyan 2 

  • Pros: 

  • Excellent sonic performance, especially in tube systems 

  • Analog‑like but more detailed than Doge 

  • Effortless, emotional, “sunny” presentation 

  • Excellent synergy with tube systems 

  • Heavy, solid build 

  • Slim enough to stack with streamer, saving a shelf. 

  • Cons: 

  • LEDs too bright and no way to dim them 

  • Auto input switching not user‑controllable 

  • No remote. There is no way to change settings at all. 

  • Cheap bumpers instead of feet. 

Gustard R26 

  • Pros: 

  • Strong bass foundation and large stage 

  • Excellent in solid‑state systems 

  • Detailed with many spatial cues 

  • Solid imaging (especially so with T8 source) 

  • Remote control for source selection and DAC parameters 

  • Heavy, well‑built chassis 

  • Excellent ergonomics in a multi‑source system 

  • Slim enough to stack with streamer, saving a shelf. 

 

  • Cons: 

  • Slightly dark tonality may not suit all systems 

  • Can sound a bit hard or glary in tube systems 

  • Display too dim even on brightest setting 

  • Tiny tiny tiny menu display font for DAC parameters 

 

System‑dependent verdict 

  • In System #1: ARC/B&W tube system with Eversolo T8  

(and later with swapped-in Eversolo DMP-A6) 

 

  • Winner: Holo Audio Cyan 2 (but close second with DMP-A6) 

  • Close Second: Doge 7 (but winner with DMP-A6) 

  • Third: Gustard R26 

 

  • In System #2: Levinson/ML Summit solid‑state system with Eversolo DMP-A6 (and later with swapped-in Eversolo T8) 

 

  • Winner: Gustard R26 

  • Second: Holo Audio Cyan 2 

  • Distant Third: Doge 7 

Final takeaway: These DACs are highly system‑dependent. 

  • For solid‑state / precision systems → Gustard R26 was the best match for my gear. 

  • For tube / analog‑voiced systems → Holo Cyan 2 or Doge 7 are the better fit with my gear. 

Where from here? 

Next up on the bench: possibly an Eversolo Z10 trial in both systems.  

Will transfer the DMP-A6 to my vintage McIntosh system and new second T8 installed in Levinson/Summit system. 

Author bio 

Author: 

  • Retired with time to listen and an understanding spouse who has allowed me to take over the living room and convert it into a hi-fi music room housing the Mark Levinson system #2 

  • Enthusiast in high‑end audio continuously since the 1960s 

  • Former owner of a used audio business, having heard/owned over 1,500 components from the 1950s to current gear 

  • Experience/ownership spans most models of classic tube and solid‑state designs 

  • Long-time Audiogon member.

  • Retired Quality Control/Electronics technician in the aerospace industry and IBM Corp. Later served as Facilities Engineer/Safety and Environmental Manager for Yamaha Music Manufacturing Division

lion

i have had the doge 7 as well as the r26, never a holo

i preferred the r26 as it had a greater sense of overall transparency than the doge, which was more classically tubey in presentation but smeared some transients and treble details despite having a spacious soundstage

also i found the doge to have relatively poor dynamics and drive when called for compared to the r26 -- i never found the r26 to seem dark, i would place it as neutral between ying and yang... the r26 did not have reticent treble but it was clean airy never sibilant... i used i2s as well as the onboard render with roon

Post removed 

Agree with your conclusions. R26 has more bass foundation vs the sunny and lighter sounding Holo in my systems. That was a good thing in my Levinson/Summit system.