Has anyone auditioned Focal Kanta 2 vs PS Audio FS 10’s ?

I know the Focals only by reputation, which tends to be mixed in my experience. I know that some listeners love the speed and clarity Focals are known for, while others consider them too bright and edgy. 

On the other hand, I have lived with the Aspen FR10s in my own system for more than a year, so I know them well. They sound very fast and transparent, while never sounding harsh or bright. Using planar-magnetic drivers for both the tweeter and midrange results in very natural and musical sound across a wide frequency range, and the use of multiple woofers and passive radiators creates a low end that is tight and impactful. Soundstage is wide and deep, and imaging is natural and realistic. The FR10s are fantastic speakers!

Thanks sdl4. I have the stand mount FR 5’s and I really like them too.

They play ”large” and throw a wide soundstage. Imagining is very good, and the image is tall ( 2 to 4 feet above the speakers) 

I think it would be wise to stay with the PS 10’s because I’ve heard the same about the Focal’s being a bit bright and analytical.

The PS audios are musical and non-fatiguing .

Can't speak for the FR10 but I know the Kanta No.1 is deceptively bright even if it measures relatively flat. Coming from B&W, the Focal be tweeter is exceptionally fast and detailed, giving it a bright perception. The Focal mid-range and woofer (No.2 & 3) are also generally known for lightness and speed while giving up a little on heft. I don't remember much about the soundstage but it was not unsatisfactory or stick out like a sore thumb.

I have heard them both, but it was a long time between each listen. 

My general impression is, the FR10's are better. Very detailed with great attack/decay, but not in any exaggerated way.