I made 2 main points in my post. The first is most people fall for the balanced headphone scam. You clearly fell for it. The second was the technical reasons to back it up. I’m not changing a word of my post because every word of it is correct. You fell for the advertising. Instead, get the schematics for this MF headphone amp, or any other one that claims to be balanced, and then we’ll see who knows what they’re talking about. But I know this will never happen. Once you see how it works, You’ll have to admit you were wrong. I’ve confronted several manufacturers on this and everyone of them reluctantly admitted that I was right.
That is most remarkable! You have a very special way of assessing how balanced lines work and how effective that can be. Good for you! That you have convinced "several manufacturers" of your views is especially impressive.
I’ve long considered Bill Whitlock to be a particular authority on this topic. As an expert, I’m sure you’ve seen his AES paper "Balanced Lines In Audio Systems: Fact, Fiction, and Transformers," which is free to AES members here. It’s peer reviewed and as an AES member I’m sure they’d welcome your comments. If you’ve let your AES membership lapse, you might be able to find a copy of the paper at academia.edu. (You may need to sign up for an account.)
Another excellent treatment by Whitlock is "Design of High-Performance Balanced Audio Interfaces." Also peer reviewed, published by AES and open for comments. A free copy is here, at least for the moment.
Given your insistence that balanced audio is:
... a marketing gimmick. There is no such thing. The people that make this stuff use the term balanced, put xlr connectors on the gear and hope you don’t ask too many questions ...
... I’m sure the professionals would welcome your thoughts. Perhaps they will be more accommodating than me. For those who might miss your AES comments, please also report back here. Have a Great Day @052rc.

