Onkyo A-50 vs Buckeye Purifi 1ET6525SA


My wife is in love with the looks of the A-50. I'm thinking I might be better off with the Stereo Purifi Amp and a Wiim Ultra as the preamp for now. More power, possibly more robust. We have a CD Player and a cheap Audio Technica turntable for now. Speakers are BMR Towers, 4-6 ohm and 85 DB. Listening distance is about 9 feet in a 14 by 14 by 8 foot room.

 

What are your thoughts on the Onkyo vs the Buckeye? Which set up would you go with?

This will be only for music at least for now. 

 

Appreciate your input. Thank you. 

chanur

I’ve always liked Onkyo stuff...still use their A-9555 (15 years old) integrated in secondary system, and Onkyo receivers in basement and garage, both 25 years old and all work flawlessly... was happy to see them return with a new set of products...

Just wanted to let you know i ordered the Onkyo P-80 and M-80 today. I'll let you know my thoughts when I get it and hook it up.

I tried the P80 from Crutchfield. I liked it, but I found a Buchardt I 150 used from the music room (TMR) which I like better as a preamp. Ended up sending the Onkyo back. I found the P 80 a little bright up top with less bass resolution than the Buchardt. These two units were on my shortlist because I run dual subs which I integrate with my custom built towers. If you’re looking to save money, I would peruse the options on TMR. You’ll get a lot of bang for your buck. My plan is to run the Buchardt using its internal amp until Galion releases its class d amps. I traded in a McIntosh MA5300 to TMR to finance my purchase, which gives you an idea of how much I liked the unit. Just a side note: unless you plan on using bass management control to roll off your main speakers into your subs I think you can get a better sounding preamp than the P 80. In person, the P80 does look stunning.