STREAMER - WHERE DO I GO FROM HERE?

AI is a great tool when you know how to deploy it and learn how to filter though the information.  I spend my days working with it as part of my work.  When AI says something I don't understand, then I try to verify or ask for clarity.  I also use it to help me better convey a point to help other understand my position.  That's good AI's purpose it to be pimped. 

I'll be brief: 

 

 @mdalton wrote “Lord.  And you started out so politely (many posts ago).”

RESPONSE:  Lol, Lord, yes. I’m very, very sorry if I came across as less than polite.  It’s not my intent to be otherwise.  I hope you know that I was just poking fun. Then again, sometimes it take a few callouses to play in the forums:  

 

You wrote, "

You can do the AI research yourself on how jitter can come from a streamer using asynchronous USB, but the short answer is:

“why some measurements show streamer differences even with asynchronous USB—the explanation involves RF noise coupling into DAC clocks, which surprises a lot of engineers.”

RESPONSE:  FACT:  Jitter does not transfer from a USB‑oriented streamer to an asynchronous DAC.  Not timing jitter. Not clock jitter. Not transport jitter.
It is blocked by design. (MY FACE IS BLUE)

@mdalton wrote “ The irony here is that I actually believe that a good streamer shouldn’t cost much, that the differences among streamers are very subtle, and that in many systems, streamers are largely irrelevant if your DAC effectively rejects jitter, and also does a good job of filtering other noise.”

RESPONSE:  We agree.   A good streamer or DAC doesn't cost much.  I didn't breed.  So, I have no greedy munchkin's waiting for an inheritance.  My last check will bounce with my credit cards maxed out.  You only get so many rides around the sun. Max every day. Life's too short to listen to Schitt. 

@mdalton wrote “But the only question we’ve been debating is whether noise from a streamer can affect SNR at the DAC end.”

(Uggh) Well, not exactly—that’s only part of it.   I believe this started when I challenged helomech’s positing that tube-based systems as incapable of differentiating between streamers.  You chimed in with a thought and it grew from there.  My responses have always been in the context of my DAC—it’s all that interests me because I’m committed to it as my endgame.  It’s the reason that I started the thread and I try to stay on topic. With that said, I believe that much of what I say applies to asynchronous DACs.

(BTW, what you describe in your “Asychronous USB” definition is exactly what I’ve been saying.)

I’m curious, what part of the article that you provided supports your point of view particularly given that the streamer when using asynchronous sends no analog waveform and only data packs containing no analog wave form.  You continue to challenge my position without supporting yours.

@mdalton wrote, that the DAC “. . .does not isolate electrical noise.”

Not true.  I’ve addressed this.  The Rex 3 DAC isolates noise in 3 ways:

1. Asynchronous USB Architecture (DAC is the master clock) - This is the primary noise‑rejection mechanism. (it’s only 1s and 0s)
2. Galvanic (i.e., electrical) through massive power‑supply Isolation (dual‑mono, multi‑stage, high‑current)
3. Fully Differential, Balanced, Tube‑Hybrid Analog Stage
   1. Fully Differential, Balanced, Tube‑Hybrid Analog Stage which reject common, ground-borne, RF and PS ripple noise.
   2. Plus,  the tube hybrid technology natuarally filters HF noise.

Any noise that survives the first two layers is canceled or absorbed in the analog stage.

And finally (yes, finally) I don’t think I ever said that noise was eliminated in other parts of the system (e.g., Amps, Preamp, Cables) even though I have a fine high-current power conditioner, with isolated inputs.  There's always noise in part of othe system.   I acknowledged that “Tubes are noisier than solid state.”  So, I understand that there's noise down the chain.  

BUT, Tell me how noise is getting from the streamer through the USB into an asynchronous DAC?

With that said, no need to answer that.  I already know that you agree with me.  You don't have to say it, because I know this topic is getting old and the gallery is likely tired of me repeating myself.  

Again, I really enjoyed this. 

 

“Sigh”.  When I was growing up, dancing in the end zone was considered bush league behavior.  And dancing before you get to the end zone, just before you fumble the ball thru the end zone is just embarrassing. 

When I respond to someone’s post, I really do try to give them the courtesy of reading and carefully considering everything they’ve written.  I wish you would do the same.  But here goes, one last time:

1) Re analog waveform - I never even responded to this point, because it’s not relevant to the points I was making.

2) Re Rex 3 DAC - I never opined on your specific DAC’s effectiveness at rejecting noise from a streamer.  My responses were always conceptual.  I would note however, that you might want to temper your confidence in your DAC if your views on this topic are informed primarily by the manufacturer’s marketing materials. That’s why, in the absence of effective measurements of such claims, I tend to maintain healthy skepticism, and suggest to other members that they may want to be safe, rather than sorry, and invest in a steamer that’s quieter than a Radpberry Pi, for instance.

3) How is noise getting from a streamer using asynchronous usb into the DAC.  Here, I’m just gonna cut and paste from my prior post in hopes that you’ll read it this time.

“Even with asynchronous USB, several noise paths remain:

1. Power Noise via USB 5V

USB cables include a 5-volt power line. A noisy streamer (like a computer or cheap switching PSU) can send:

• switching noise

• RF noise

• ground ripple

into the DAC.

Good DACs often ignore this power line or regulate it internally, but not always perfectly.

2. Ground Noise

USB connects the grounds of both devices.

This can allow: • ground loops

• digital switching noise

• RF interference

to propagate into the DAC circuitry.

3. Radiated RF Noise

Even if the data is clean, the USB cable itself can act like an antenna carrying RF noise into sensitive analog sections of the DAC.

Why Many Modern DACs Handle This Well:

High-quality DACs often include:

include:

• USB isolation chips

• galvanic isolation

• reclocking

• local linear regulation

 

✅ Bottom line:

• Asynchronous USB fixes timing/jitter issues.

• It does not guarantee electrical isolation.

• Noise from the streamer can still reach the DAC, though good DAC designs minimize it.”

 

 

 

I'll repeat: Try the USB connection from your A8 to your streamer.

I doubt you can do better.  If you do the DAC is at fault, a properly executed asynch USB connection provides essentially total isolation from jitter and noise issues in the digital stream.

 

OP, send your Eversolo into John Tucker of eXemplar Audio and he will install a very nice external power supply that will make you smile.  Just a huge sonic upgrade.  Find a nice separate dac and you are done. His power supplies are amazing using the best voltage regulation in the industry.  The Eversolo’s weakness is their power supply and John fixes that! Great sounding streamer after the mod/upgrade.  

@retiredaudioguy wrote "I'll repeat: Try the USB connection from your A8 to your streamer."

RESPONSE - That's all I can do until I find a replacement.  

@grannyring wrote "send your Eversolo into John Tucker of eXemplar Audio and he will install a very nice external power supply that will make you smile.  Just a huge sonic upgrade.  Find a nice separate dac and you are done." 

RESPONSE:  An interesting suggestion; however, although it's a good performer, the A8 is not a keeper for me.  I want a larger screen, larger physical size and better performance out of the box.  It's screen is too small for me.  If it was an end game transsport, then I'd consider mods.  Its future is the auction block or a move to a garage system.  

. . .and my DAC can't get any more done.