I didn't use Tidal long enough to give it a fair chance. Going from Apple Music to Qobuz was a real awakening. Only thing that bugs me about Qobuz is the quality of the music files vary greatly from one artist's release to another, even though Qobuz may report the resolution to be the same. I don't know if that is just a characteristic of streaming, or Qobuz. With Apple it was all crappy so didn't make a difference.
Qobuz vs. Tidal — Real-World Impressions on Selection, Sound Quality & Musicality
Hi all,
I’ve been running both Qobuz and Tidal side-by-side recently and thought I’d share my impressions and invite discussion from folks who’ve lived with one or both of these services in high-end systems.
To set context, my typical listening is across jazz, rock, folk/classic singer-songwriter, and a fair bit of classical (orchestral and chamber). I’m running a resolving front end (high-res capable DAC, quality analog chain, big neutral room) and mastering differences genuinely matter to me.
Here are my observations so far:
1) Selection & Catalog
- Tidal: Larger overall catalog, more mainstream coverage, and includes videos & multimedia extras that can be nice on a home theater/TV app. Very few “I can’t find it at all” moments in popular to mid-tier music.
- Qobuz: Slightly smaller overall library, but where it shines is in deeper corners — particularly classical and jazz. Qobuz seems to have more historical pressings, rarities, and some European label stuff that either isn’t on Tidal or is harder to find.
- Overlap: Huge — most music I search for is on both. But the exceptions tend to be the kinds of things deeper listeners care about (older jazz sessions, small indie/legacy classical catalogs).
Question to the group: What are specific titles you find only on one service?
2) Sound Quality & Masters
- Both services now offer lossless FLAC up to 24-bit/192kHz — so on paper, neither has a monopoly on high-res streaming.
- Tidal: Historically leaned on MQA; now that it’s largely FLAC and hi-res, the playing field has narrowed. The sound is clean, full-bodied, and transparent.
- Qobuz: Master presentation occasionally feels a touch more natural or analog-like, especially on classical and acoustic jazz. I wouldn’t call it night-and-day, but on familiar reference recordings you can hear subtle differences that make certain recordings more “alive.” Whether that’s mastering choice or delivery chain is a fair question — but in my system it’s noticeable at times.
- MoFi and special masters: Neither service streams official MoFi or other special masters; Qobuz playlists with MoFi branding are useful for discovery but not guaranteed to be the actual MoFi master.
Question to the group: Have you found consistently better mastering quality on one service? Which genres show this most clearly?
3) Usability & Ecosystem
- Tidal: The interface is clean and has good playlist sharing. App stability is generally reliable across platforms, and integrations (Roon, Audirvana) are smooth.
- Qobuz: The UI can feel less polished depending on platform. Discovery tools and editorial are good, especially for jazz and classical (composer info, liner notes), but searching sometimes feels more clunky than Tidal’s.
- Downloads: Qobuz has an advantage if you like to purchase and keep high-res albums as files (which is great for archival listening and integration into local libraries).
4) Real-World Listening Impressions
In casual listening (background or mixed playlists), you’ll be extremely happy with either service. In focused reference listening, the differences come down to:
- Catalog depth for niche material
- Mastering choices on particular recordings
- How much you value editorial/liner info vs. sheer convenience
For instance:
- A Tidal FLAC and a Qobuz FLAC of the same performance can feel different in tonality and microdetail; sometimes Qobuz has a version with wider dynamic swings or more natural decay in solo instruments.
- In rock/pop, differences are smaller — far more about mastering than platform.
Where Both Make Sense
A common pattern I’ve seen and lived:
- Use Tidal as the wide net everyday service
- Use Qobuz as a supplement for deeper jazz/classical and specific hi-res masters
Questions for the AOG Community
- Do you run both services, or have you chosen one? Why?
- Are there specific albums where you feel Qobuz’s version is categorically superior to Tidal’s (or vice versa)?
- How much does interface/discovery matter compared to raw sound quality/mastering?
- Does anyone prefer Tidal exclusively for any of the classical repertoire?
Looking forward to actual listening impressions (not marketing talk), and any specific examples of where one service genuinely outperforms the other.
- ...
- 48 posts total
Great thread with a lot of great and accurate feedback! I used to have both and now just Qobuz. I think for a more casual listener, particularly for great background music listening, Tidal wins. Qobuz for the critical listener, but again as many people have touched on, it depends on the overall catalog of music you prefer. The other thing Tidal has, that I haven’t seen anyone point out, is it has a “Normalize Volume” feature balancing the level of all the songs. This by far creates a better experience for the casual listener when it comes to having parties so you’re not messing with the volume constantly. With Qobuz, there’s a wide range of output level between albums, but I think that may contribute, my guess, as to why Qobuz is sonically better. Normalizing volume means there’s some type of filter or equalization going on to make that happen. It’s something in the way no matter how you manipulate it and I’ve always suspected that may have something to do with Qobuz sounding better, though I have no proof, again just opinion. Because we entertain frequently, hang out by the pool, etc., at some point I may switch back to Tidal just for that one feature of having the sound balanced. It’s extremely noticeable in our outdoor system when playing Qobuz and end up having to split the difference on the volume level to where songs aren’t too loud, but softer tracks you can still hear them reasonably well. Again, great topic and thread! Cheers, Chris |
Great topic, thank you! I would just add that there's one very important factor that none of the above posts considers, and that is payments to artists. According to several online sources, Qobuz pays more than Tidal and considerably more than Spotify. If you want to support the artists you stream, that's a big plus for Qobuz in my book. |
I subscribe to both Quboz and Tidal. I stream Quboz on main system- prefer sound quality typically (can vary with album), enjoy greater availability of liner notes/reviews on Qoboz, the simpler way that Quboz presents new music, and greater selection of jazz albums. The Tidal offerings can be overwhelming. I stream Tidal in my car and have a family subscription to Tidal- the Tidal catalog is better match than Quboz for my sons’ tastes.
Y’all might have interest in this thread comparing streaming directly via Qoboz Connect vs streaming Qoboz via the Aurender Conductor app.
|
Back 6+ years ago, I was in the market for a digital streaming service and looked at both Tidal and QoBuz. I got together with one of my good audiophile friends and we did a song-by-song comparison of several ones we were both very familiar with. We tried to make sure it was songs from the same album on each website for a consistent and better comparison. Most of the time we both preferred the music heard from QoBuz than Tidal, with the differences just subtle but the music seemed a little more realistic with QoBuz. So, we chose QoBuz and never looked back. Recently though, I've found that many of the CD-quality (16 bit/44.1) music is now only available in HD ! The titles are there but when selected are not found. This is disturbing to me as many of the Red-book CD's IMHO sounded more realistic than their HD counterparts. I e-mailed QoBuz with my questions as to why the original 16/44.1 albums are no longer available but never got an answer. I may give Tidal a try soon to see if they have done the same thing and if not, I may switch. |
- 48 posts total