And please, stop calling equipment reviewers journalists, they are not.
A magazine has an editorial policy that identifies their mission as one other than advertising or marketing. It’s not me calling them journalists, it’s me noting that they have self-identified that way. Many youtube channels repeatedly tell us that they are here for "us" – to give us honest opinions. *That’s* where the "journalism" label comes from.
But the point is not the word "journalist." It is the promise of objectivity without the delivery.
Me personally, I have no time to read bad reviews. What for?
Because honest, direct and frank language is more efficient. This is the language you are using in your post, and its refreshing and easy to read.
Why would you want to spend extra time "reading between the lines" rather than getting concise and truthful information?

