The llnis of generalisation : ''wich or what is the best''?
The paradox of ''set theory'' ; ''the set of all sets''.
One put the quantifier ''all'' in de place of ''subject '' of the sentence without
knowing what this means.
The ''formula'' is:
1, all x satisfy condition Fx and Gx . if one x does not satisfy conditon F and G
then the whole generalisation is not true
2. some x are Fx and Gx (=existential quantifier) . To be true at list one x
sould satisfi both condions
F and G are only examles of varibles ; one can write them also as
a,,b,c, ....n
Meaning and reference. All physicist knew what ''Higs particle means'' in the
sence of contribution to the theory but nobody knew if it exist. Only after
prove in colider in Switserland the existance is proven . Not only assumed.
For example:; who knows how many AT cartidges are made.? How than
should one know ''which is the best''? One own, say, 5 and about them
one can quantify. Say AT 180 is the best from those which I own.

