Brand new vinyl - what’s acceptable to you?


I just ordered a dozen new albums - this time all 180 g variants. The Norah Jones had a scratch on it coming out of the paper sleeve the first time. (Separate gripe - why do they package ostensibly “audiophile” albums in crappy sleeves which might actually damage a record?).  I’ll return the Norah Jones. But, the Miles Davis album has a noisy spot 1/4 the way through the first track. I’ll try cleaning the record but usually don’t have to for a new album. Or should I as a better practice? (This old dog can learn new habits).

Fortunately, the Pat Metheny is dead quiet - thank you ECM! All my ECM vinyl - even from decades ago are quiet. However, my experience is that ECM is very much an outlier: that most labels will come with some noise.

I’m working my way through all the albums but it made me want to poll the group: How much noise do you accept on a new pressing?  Do you have a rule of thumb for what to reject?

Thanks,

 

mgrif104

@mgrif104 that’s not bad. I’m sure they’ll exchange the bad Norah Jones record. 

You reminded me that I have a Scheherazade with Eugine Ormandy on Columbia stereo pressing from 1962 that I bought at a thrift store for around a dollar and change about 3-4 years ago. The record looks mint. Most likely never even removed from its sleeve. I’ve had it sitting around and never played it. So I gave Scheherazade a nice bath of tergikleen followed by a rinse and the thew it into USCM and man it’s really perfect. Sounds incredible. 

@audphile1 nice find! 

While I’m quite pleased with mine - it wasn’t around a dollar in cost!

I’ve been going through pressings at thrift/antique stores. Most have looked pretty shabby. I’ll be getting a humminguru so maybe I don’t need to be so afraid.

To be fair, not all of the old records look shabby, but I’ve never wanted a copy of the Partridge Family.  “Not that there’s anything wrong with that”. That’s just me.

Best,

@vair68robert 

Do you know the name of the antistatic brush?  I’m using the AudioQuest one and it seems fairly effective but I’d like to know which one you’re recommending.

Best,

@mgrif104 I think @vair68robert is talking about this 

https://hudsonhifi.com/products/antistaticbrush

I’ve been looking at this as well but 1) not fan of gluing attachments to my turntable and 2) zerostat is pretty effective at removing static. 
I noticed in my system most of the time a regular antistatic record brush is all that’s needed if record is washed and re-sleeved in a fresh rice paper sleeve like MoFi or Hudson HiFi which I bought to try and found to be excellent. 

@mgrif104 

Yes the Hudson HiFi , you  don't glue it you use a double sided tape , I have it about 180 degrees from the cartridge ,  The anti static brush and zero stat remove electric charges before you play , the is removing the static electric as it's generated while playing the record . I used a static removing brush that was supposed to remove the charge thru your body , it didn't seem to work well in the winter .