Tekton Double Impact SE vs Kef R7 Meta


Hello everyone, I’m looking for some help with my eventual upgrade path. I currently have a pair of Kef Q350 being powered by a Willsenton R8. I enjoy the clarity, detail, and instrument separation of the Kef’s, but they can be a bit polite. Soundstage is great as well, tonal balance is good as well. I’ve been looking at the R7 metas figuring they have similar sound characteristics as the Q350s just with more refinement and overall better sound, but I realize the Willsenton might be a bit underpowered (especially in triode mode) to really make them sing. Tekton is a name that keeps coming up in my research. I realize they can be a bit of a controversial choice do to some of the issues they’ve had with reviewers. All I really am concerned with is, how do they actually sound. I really want to keep that clarity that the KEFs have. We listen primarily to rock, metal, and electronic music. My room is rather large. It’s a 19’x 39’ great room (living room, dining room, and kitchen. 
 

I’d like to hear from people that have had experience with either of these speakers with similar amplification and what their thoughts are. I’m also open to other speaker suggestions. Thank you!

dstryker77

devinplombier - Yes, you should listen first and trash after, once you have a "real" data point. If you’ve never listened to a product, how can you dismiss it?

@jcatdcat that’s a fair point. 

With regard to Wilson speakers, I’ve heard Sasha, Sabrina, and watt puppies so I do have some basis in fact.

Now, to call them "trash" may be a bit of a rhetorical flourish; they are competent for the most part, but they’re still grossly overpriced (note that I didn’t say "expensive" because in my view there’s nothing wrong with expensive). Also, they’re fantastically ugly, except for the Sabrina, which is unassuming and plain.

As I’ve said, I will never give one red cent to businesses that threaten and intimidate reviewers whose reviews they deem insufficiently deferential, therefore I have little interest in seeking auditions of Tekton products.

If I ever own Tektons, they will have been bought used, and they will likely reside in my home theater. I have a double standard when it comes to home theater vs 2-channel.

I’m still curious why a number of folks who are otherwise not known to hold back on criticism praise tekton so highly; so if I run across a pair, I will sit down and listen with an open mind and see what the fuss is about.

 

devinplombier - Thanks for your honest and respectful response. As I've probably already noted, I to have listened to many very high end products over the years costing as much as $150K+, and like to think I've owned a few (Vandersteen, Sequerra and Martin Logan to mention a few). Some of my preferences have changed over the years, but I still want to close my eyes and have the components, specifically the speakers, disappear and leave me with just the music and the sheer aural bliss that I'm listening for.

@mark200mph wrote

I do not think scanspeak and satori beryllium at an upgrade are junk speakers.

Neither do I.

However, that beryllium driver upgrade is $11,750 - more than the speakers themselves.

In fact the $10K (base) ulbricht you speak of top out at $26K all decked out. They better sound good! But what happened to the giant-slayer value proposition?

 

For my reference speakers focal magico q7,kharma ect it's only 10% of the price.in my book that's a giant slayer. Full of the best speakers satori makes and sound great play soft or loud. Even rockports are expensive. This is the glory of audio we live in. A great day of choices. I bought all my reverence equipment used < 50 % off met alot of nice audiophiles in my travels past 2 years wandering across America living in a van by the river eating government cheese1😃