I really wish they made a version of this as a DAC only. I don't need the streamer, or the preamp. so I'd be paying extra to have features I'll never use.
Meitner MA3i DAC Review
A pretty comprehensive review of the Meitner MA3i DAC with measurements.
https://hometheaterhifi.com/reviews/dac/emm-labs-ma3i-digital-to-analog-converter-review/
- ...
- 84 posts total
The imersiv D-1 should never be used with a preamp since you lose resolution. It sounds terrific direct to amp. I always used to say that my setups sounded better with DAC to my Benchmark HPA4 or LA4 preamp and then to amp. The imersiv D-1 was the first DAC that broke that rule for me and I sold the HPA4. The first time in over a decade where I do not have a HPA4 or LA4 preamp. The Meitner MA3i is the second DAC that I have heard that sounds terrific straight to DAC. I am also starting to open up to take a slight hit in streaming performance to use Ethernet and forgo the better fibre streamer. I did ROON Grouped streams and was able to easily hear the difference between Ethernet and fibre on the MA3i. The difference was small and if I go with Ethernet, I eliminate a bunch of gear.
|
MA3i needs something between it and the router to suppress the noise that the router might be generating. |
@yyzsantabarbara Not to mix responses… Yes the preamp section in MA3i is fantastic. No issues running direct into amp. I’ve tested that. |
@audphile1 While we are back on this subject, I would be interested in your comments comparing the Bricasti M3 (which I have, and you had) to the Meitner. How would you describe the overall sound difference? I have heard that the Meitner can be a bit warm, where I would not describe the Bricasti in that way. I am enjoying the more incisive sound of the Bricasti over my previous warmer DAC, but of course am considering an upgrade in the Bricasti line to the M1, or the Meitner. Also tossed in there is the Tambaqui. Thoughts? |
- 84 posts total

