terrible form to both post three times in a row and talk about another TT here but just briefly wanted to say about the Techdas Af3p
1. it is remarkably similar to the platine really. so simple. a separate motor, a chassis and then a platter.
2. differences are that instead of magnet we are on air. suction also a difference. also platter is twice as heavy and gunmetal instead of aluminium
3. just as with platine you adjust the tenson on the belt to suit yourself. least tension is best but i have to help it get up to speed if i don't want to wait an age (again just like my platine). mechanism to adjust tension is great as you dont need to move motor.
4. as it has bedded in and i get belt tension right it seems very musical and non-mechanical. the silence achieved is quite something. the motor itself produces alot less noise than my platine motor.
overall i think the platter is a huge improvement over platine and the usabilty is probably better for a wider range of people. i definitely think the platine is in the same class of record players as the af3p (whatever that is).
but you do get alot more resolution with the af3p and that feeling of alot of simultaneous sound being resolved and communicated that perhaps wasn't previously. of course the platine was a huge improvement on the garrard 401 for me in the same way.

