@elliottbnewcombjr I think I've been using mentions correctly here, but I apologize if I've gotten it wrong in earlier posts. It's the first thread I've created on this forum.
Why Rega? A few reasons: I've owned a Planar 3/RB300 in the (distant) past and enjoyed the 'table. The simplicity of the Rega turntable 'system' is also appealing at this point. I've spent decades playing around with high-end audio gear, reviewing gear for some small audio publications etc. At this point I just want to spend time enjoying/rediscovering my LP collection rather than thinking about the hardware. So the ultimate flexibility in mixing/matching gear is of less importance to me.
That said, I do wish that the Rega arms had a more convenient way to adjust VTA. Spacers 'work', but they aren't the most elegant of solutions. OTOH, I don't consider the lack of a removable headshell a negative. The fewer electrical connections between the cartridge and the tonearm the better, IMHO. Most high-end turntable manufacturers seem to agree. The lack of a clamp to physically couple the LP to the platter is another negative of the Rega in my book. But Roy Gandy has his own way of thinking and it's hard to argue with his long-term success. Not ideal, but not a showstopper.

