RB, off the top of my head I am not sure you’re correct regarding horizontal effective mass for an LT tonearm, because there is still a distribution of mass between stylus tip and the air bearing such that mass near the tip is more readily moved than mass at the bearing. I think it would still depend upon the distribution.As you said most of the mass is at the distal end. I have not looked it up on ChatGPT or even the internet in general. Just guessing.
What considerations apply to material selection for cartridge mounting bolts?
I have found myself needing some longer bolts to relocate a Shure V15 Type 3 cartridge to a Holbo air-bearing system.
The Holbo tone-arm is a tangential tracker with a rigid rectangular 'launch pad' for the cartridge. The pad is 3-mm thick which is much more than the fixed SME head-shell my dad bolted the Shure to some 45 years ago. If it was supplied with longer bolts, they disappeared decades ago!
I will most likely have a similar issue with my Audio Technica VM540ML cartridge which is probably a better fit for the Holbo. It was supplied with a head-shell 4-mm thick, but the bolts slots are recessed by over 2-mm.
A quick internet search turned up bolts made of stainless steel, titanium, aluminium, brass, plastic and nylon. Some brass bolts are gold-plated (for corrosion resistance presumably). As a one-time metallurgist, I know that stainless steels can be non-magnetic, or magnetic.
Plastic and nylon are lightweight insulators and immune to electro-magnetic effects like induced eddy currents.
The lower the material density, the lower effective mass of the cartridge. Here brass is clearly the worst, being denser than steel and weaker than the other metals.
I presume that the main engineering requirement is to firmly couple the cartridge to the tone-arm but I have no idea how firmly.
The Funk Firm has an opposite view with its Houdini coupler which in effect splits the bolts in half, with an elastic suspension between the cartridge body and the tone-arm. It seems to allow the cartridge body to swing easily to the left or right side. Does anybody here use these?
- ...
- 68 posts total
@lewm outer tube On the Holbo, as opposed to servo-driven tangential arms, the entire arm assembly including the air bearing outer tube acts as a single rigid mass. The bearing outer tube is about 70-mm long, while the business end of the tone arm is just a tad over twice that, forming a rigid T. The cartridge end really only has two degrees of freedom, because of the T-shape and 10-micron tolerances. It can only pivot precisely vertically, and it can only slide precisely horizontally, on an essentially friction-free air-layer. When the stylus moves sideways, it has to act on the entire mass, no matter how distal or proximal each bit is. There is no need to even introduce the artificial concept of effective mass. One consequence of the design is that there is virtually no fore-and-aft movement at the cartridge so nasties in the groove like scratches and dust don't set off sympathetic rattles. The cartridge cannot rotate in any plane except vertical, which it has to do to ride warps. No matter how closely I look, I cannot see any jerkiness or stiction whatsoever in the sliding motion. Quite brilliant design, in my opinion |
I never thought of asking ChatGPT but since you mentioned it ...
I started with "what is the effective mass of a holbo tangential tone arm" and got the textbook answer for vertical effective mass. Then I tried "what is the effective horizontal mass of a holbo tangential tone arm" and got a better answer, though a bit waffly:
Then I put my original question in again, and got a refinement as ChatGPT added the horizontal component. It learns:
|
- 68 posts total

