How long for an HDMI cable to break in.


I've been using an Audioquest Blueberry for a little while and just got the Vodka 48 8k/10k to compare. I'm not hearing initially much of a difference and certainly not $600 worth. Anybody else compare the two? Direction is correct. When I put the Vodka in I realized the Blueberry was in wrong!

roxy1927

I think I would need to be on the wrong end of a couple of bottles of Vodka to pay the eye watering prices for some of these HDMI cable cons. Look I get it, some "High-end" audio gear can support lossless audio up to 32-bit and sample rates as high as 1563 kHz, even at these transfer rates it would result in a data rate of just 100Mps! Why would anyone think there are advantages in using HMDI 2.2.  It just uses the pins for LVDS differential signaling, which is good for reducing jitter but there are plenty of other ways Jitter can be controlled or even eliminated. I have even read that some forum users say a slightly longer cable is preferred for "tonal signature" now thats funny! It sounds like they are describing the audible effects of signal integrity loss, timing errors and noise! So what about cable quality? It only only matters for impedance consistency and shielding, not for bandwidth. Audio data rates are tiny compared to HDMI video (a few Mbps vs. multiple Gbps), so the “Ultra High Speed” rating of HDMI 2.1/2.2 is irrelevant. A well constructed standard HDMI even older spec is sufficient for I²S-over-HDMI because the signal integrity depends on proper impedance and shielding, not on 48 Gbps capability! If you want to spaff stupid amounts of hard earned on this nonesense, its entirely up to you it's your cash but for me, decent cables built and terminated well, conforming to electronic scientific principles should be all that is needed  and they can be found at very reasonable prices. I dont mean to upset anyone but...........

 I cannot believe I read this thread, I must be bored. 

Here is the answer: 

We are having absolutely no problem running 4K, 60Hz, with the 35 foot, 8K cable (@ $41) and like I said, I run it through walls and baseboard and it is rated for this.  I’m betting many of those high priced cables are not.

I noticed a slight difference in the plug between this and my other HDMI cables in that on this cable the internal portion of the plugs have a red coloration to them.

@nubiann 

@toddalin's 8K 48-Gbps HDMI cable was just over one dollar per foot. Why choose anything less?

Especially for I2S, which MDMI cable was never designed to support anyway.

I2S was never designed for any more than chip-to-chip transfer on a board, after all.  Go for the shortest length possible, and hope!

Technically the name for the 48-Gbps cable is Ultra High Speed HDMI Cable.

It is tested for better resistance to EMI than other HDMI cables.  It has to be tested with its terminations in place and is tested in special EMI labs.

So my advice is don't scrimp but also don't pay a premium if there is a cheaper, certified Ultra High Speed HDMI Cable available.