What Does 80 Grand Get You Nowadays?


A system was playing in a shop. I sat down and pretty soon I thought gosh, I’m glad my system sounds better than this.

That system - just preamp, amp, and speakers - cost about $80,000 new.

I didn’t make the speakers at first, because Sabrinas look far better than the usual Wilson house look. They were driven by one of those new high-end Marantz amps, and I don’t think that was a match made in heaven. The Marantz was driven by a Dan D’Agostino pre that looked like a Minion had been crushed in a hydraulic press. Audiophile music was streaming, but I did not catch whence issued those dulcet ones and zeroes.

I suppose that system constitutes high-end for some. Now, it certainly sounded competent, but it also sounded boring. I thought, this is the Audi SUV of audio: competent and boring.

Conversely, I was impressed and pleased to no end that the end sound of my modest system from the last century could play in the same league as an almost-six figure modern system, and do so in a more engaging and fun fashion - to my ears, at least.

I’m biased, of course; and I am certain many high-priced systems out there leave mine in the dust. Still, I would have thought $80,000 guaranteed a better baseline sound.

How about you, have you heard a lot of gear whose sound was way out of whack with its price?

 

devinplombier

Well, I recently heard a system compromised of the Wilson Audio Sabrina V ($28k), D'Agostino Pendulum integrated ($18k), dCS Lina DAC X ($15.5k), and dCS Lina Master Clock ($8k) plus quite a bit of higher end interconnects and power cables and it sounded really good.  Without the cables it was $69.5k which leaves room for cables to be added.

There are no shortcuts. Splashing eighty grand on a new system is no substitute for years or decades of careful system building. This is a process not an event.

@newton_john 

These are all very good points.

The Sabrinas were the 3rd Wilsons to which I have listened, after Sashas and some variety of Watt Puppies. If I’m going to be honest the WPs had surprisingly decent bass, but all three shared a competent but unexciting, somewhat remote sound signature. Granted these are Wilson’s "budget" offerings, so I would not generalize to their high-end speakers. Also, I have to wonder what role, if any, its somewhat haphazard pairing played into my perception of that Sabrinas-based system.

Your point about expensive systems we hear at dealers or shows seldom coming close to our own is well taken. Sometimes I do wonder if I’m too accustomed to my system’s end sound and I reject speakers that sound different, equating different with worse. But I have been impressed by several speakers with very different end sounds, including a Sanders 10e set that sounded absolutely wonderful.

I would have been happy to take it home, if it hadn’t been for the panels’ extreme beaminess.

 

“A system was playing in a shop. I sat down and pretty soon I thought gosh, I’m glad my system sounds better than this.”
I am happy for you.