Anyone else prefer listening to their system more than a concert?


I know I do. It seems like most people on this forum don't feel that way. That's OK. To each his own. 

For me, I like being able to control the volume. I like choosing what song I want to hear. I like not being in a crowd. I like hearing the music without any distracting sounds from others. I like the privacy. I like the convenience. I think my system sounds wonderful. I'm a happy camper.

Just my opinion. Not trying to change anyone else's mind.

Enjoy the music! Whichever way pleases you.

tomcarr

In my experience it depends on the acoustics of venue, the quality of the reproduction equipment, the artists and the creative skills, expertise and care employed by people who sit at the desks creating the sound & lighting mix.

I have been at gigs where it I wished I was in front of my system instead of getting assaulted by poor sound quality, precious hearing getting battered with overly loud, poorly mixed and reproduced sound.

I watched the tribute band “Australian Pink Floyd” last weekend at my local arena which is modern and well appointed for 3,500 in a mix of standing and seating or 2,200 fully seated. The band played a tribute to the "Wish You Were Here" as well as a well judged selection of fan pleasers, finishing with a brilliant reprise of comfortably numb.

Not knowing what to expect, I can say I was completely stunned by the quality of the sound in the auditorium, it was crystal clear exceptionally dynamic and emotionally engaging. It was powerful without hurting the ears, with placement of the musicians obvious from the first song.

It was backed up by amazing visuals akin to the pulse concerts and I remember on the way home both my son and myself still excited and thrilled by just how brilliant the band were. They were as near as it makes no difference, note for note perfect in their reproduction of one of the all-time great live bands but also how exceptional the sound was and visuals were. The whole experience was underpinned by this and being in the company of likeminded people who were equally as enthusiastic. My lad was of the same opinion and has substantially younger hearing than me.

I guess there will be some purist out there that will recoil in horror at the tribute band experience but just consider, anything played by a full symphony orchestra is a tribute or interpretation, some breathtakingly great others not so much. However, now and again you come accross one or two "modern" non orchestral bands who get it spot on and this case it was the closest we would ever get to watching Pink Floyd live again, I saw them in Live 8 but my lad has never had that experience and was thrilled by just how brilliant the night was.

For all the reasons above this experience in my opinion, could not be reproduced on any HIFI system. That’s not to say my high-end’ish system doesn’t move, delight and amaze me every day I sit in front of it. I do regard it as an Instrument of music reproduction. I am just saying the experience of live music done well, is fundamentally different. We just have to accept it is the real thing and everything else is a facsimile.  

I also find that my own mood and the ambience at the time in my home, greatly influences me and my listening experiences. For instance, I had the Log burner roaring away on a cold UK Monday evening after work, combine this with the gorgeous glow of the Tube amps and VU meters as well as the twinkling white lights of this years Christmas tree and Fireplace garland, Boz Scaggs Dig Album seemed to take on another level of engagement, I almost felt he was going to comment on the Christmas tree or the lovely fire blazing away, he was that present in the room.

So I guess I am saying both live and recorded have their merits and delights but one should always endeavour to find the time and enjoy both if you can.

For me, actually deciding to go to a concert (of any type of music), my first consideration is if l respect the artist, or artists that are performing. Sometimes it can be the conductor of the orchestra that over rides even the music performed.

There is nothing quite as thrilling as hearing a 100 piece orchestra conducted by the actual composer, who best knows how the music should be performed.

The same applies to a pop or rock group if the original members are still present to reproduce the songs as intended, or add embellishments and refinements they have adapted to over the years. Often the degree of professionalism and musicianship has matured over the years too, and the performance now is far more refined. 
 

Those are the two main reasons why l will still selectively attend live concerts. Of course the original records or CDs remain the original focus point as to why l liked the music, and those first impressions. I like the best of both worlds.

Great post! I prefer my system at home. 2 exceptions; 

 

Iron Maiden - seen them 5 times. My very first concert when I was 15, and then again at 50. They were actually better this last go round. You cannot CANNOT create anything close to the mesmerizing energy that Maiden brings to their performances. Hypnotic as anyone who has seen them knows. 
 

TSO - just saw them Black Friday in Manchester, NH. We go every year and again the energy and the show they put on cannot be recreated.

 

Other than that, I’m perfectly content at home one on one with my system for many of the same reasons listed above by other members

I love both. The type of live gigs I have attended (and played in) over the decades are different than the larger concerts. Here  the musicians lug in their gear. They set it up. Everyone collects and the band plugs in and shortly thereafter lets it rip. It’s about passion, energy and pure exhilaration.  I love it. 

I don’t like live music, it doesn’t sound anything like the realism of my stereo system.