If Warmth Is a Distortion, Why Do So Many Audiophiles Still Defend It?


Hi everyone, this is my first post here. If it stirs some emotions — that’s not a bad thing. It means we’re all still passionate about this hobby.

As AI becomes capable of recreating any sound signature — warm, tube-like, analogue, ultra-wide, hyper-detailed, and everything in between — I’m starting to think the real future of audio lies in neutral, transparent, dynamic, and accurate hardware, while many of the “flavours” we chase may soon become software choices.

Over time, a few things have stood out to me:

• Warmth is pleasant, but it’s still coloration.
Beautiful, yes — but not accuracy, not transparency, and not always the artist’s intention.

• Warm gear enhances some tracks but softens accuracy in others.
Especially vocals, piano, violin, guitar, and other acoustic instruments. Some people hear this, some don’t, and some just prefer it that way.

• Modern Class D deserves more respect than it gets.
Many older audiophiles dismiss it based on outdated assumptions. But the latest designs are already extremely neutral, fast, and precise. I’m not sure how much longer Class A/AB will remain relevant beyond nostalgia and brand loyalty.

• Price reflects real quality only up to a point.
Beyond that, it becomes about branding, house sound, and personal bias. Preference is fine — but preference isn’t the same as absolute fidelity.


---

⭐ Why I May Not Respond Immediately

This post is meant as a sharing of thoughts, not a debate I plan to defend point by point.
If I don’t reply right away, it’s because I’m taking time to read, think, and learn from others’ perspectives here.

Posting in good faith — looking forward to all views, supportive or critical.

hkcharlie

Before recommending [the NIOSH app] on this forum I did check to see if it is also available on Android phones. This search listed it fourth of five apps for Android phones: Android user apps for sound level meter - Search

@sargonicuse 

Congratulations! You have successfully demonstrated AI is dead wrong sometimes and sources should always be checked.

Try looking for the NIOSH app in Google Play instead, and see for yourself that it is not there.

 

@devinplombier @viber6 

Thanks, but I'm going to pass. I didn't use AI. I used the Bing web search engine in Microsoft Edge which itself might use AI, but doing a direct AI search was not my intention.

FWIW, if interested I found this paper from the journal Applied Acoustics which provides a "sound" (no pun intended) reason why the NIOSH app doesn't work on Android phones:

Smartphone-based sound level measurement apps: Evaluation of compliance with international sound level meter standards - ScienceDirect

As stated, there are plenty of fine alternatives for Android phone owners. 

Best.

Dear @nubiann : " Nobody, not even most artists have a handle on how a recording should sound. We are humans and have both a limitation and a personal reaction to what we hear.""

 

Yes, we have our personal system targets and MUSIC/sound priorities.

Each one of us , no matter what, already choosed our " thousands " of trade-offs in what we listen in the room/system during recording reproduction.

 

"  but to me it sounds wonderful with most recorded music. "

 

That's all what we have to care and certainly we do not need validation of any one because what we like, no matter what, is what we are listening. Some audiophiles need that validation or like to show how theor system performs and always I ask: who cares about but the system owner and this with all respect is true form my point of view.

 

 

""  you don’t need huge ugly room treatments; soft furnishings rugs and curtains will do a great job of calming a live room . ""

 

Agree word by word.

 

Yes we just can't avoid room/system colorations where these colorations/noise/distortions is always developed through all room/system no matters what.

We have what we have.

 

At the end even with all those trade offs/colorations we really enjoy our room/system recording quality levelperformances durin our listen sessions and we do because we almost all are MUSIC lovers that we can enjoy it even in the car radio.

 

R.

Alrighty, let’s move on from those instruments sounding warm here and there... to begin with...

You busted out your Audio Precision and saw that amp measure flat, stared at some sinad numbers and that’s it, you’re done...It might be warm, might be neutral, or cold or whatever, but, you can’t prove its warm from those measurements you took with the Audio Precision. I know about some li’l tricks within the black art of analog circuits design to warm it up or cool it down, the sound it is, without you ever being able to prove it with your measurement. Hence, it’s what you got...stare at the measurements, your grand truth and move on (wink wink).

Oh...and if i was the mastering engineering on that album, i might have just warmed it up because I LIKED IT like that!! You wouldn’t know what the baseline ever was...., it’s what you got....go buy the album.... (wink wink)

p.s. i’ll pass on that electrostatic fake sounding bass and its unnatural sound...That Martin Logan plant....it’s only for a short drive from me, never felt the need to get one....but, you carry on with the electrostatics, if it floated your boat.

@viber6    wrote

@deep_333,

I agree with all of your statements in the box.  To be clear, I know that there is natural warmth from the tonal structure of larger instruments such as piano, pipe organ, tuba, cello, string bass.  Certain singers do have warm, rich voices, but most other singers heard live have somewhat raucous voices as though they almost have a cold. I enjoy the natural warmth from those instruments and the gifted singers with rich voices.   As a beginning violinist 60 years ago, my violin sound was scratchy and distorted.  Nowadays I have acquired skills to produce a warmer, sweet sound when I want that.  But my improved skills have also enabled me to get a more precise attack and sharper sound for certain types of music. 

But most of this thread has been a discussion of electronic warmth from audio systems.  I hate all of that.  This type of warmth is NOT the warmth of natural instruments.  It can be described as electronic warming of the naturally warm tonalities from overlay of electronic fuzz and hash.  The biggest contributor is dynamic speakers which add colorations and distort the natural harmonics of the music being played.  Electrostatics and ribbons are more neutral and impose fewer colorations.  Audio system warmth is NOT accuracy aka high fidelity.  That electronic warming reduces the detail of the warm natural sound.  The string quartet you heard certainly has warmth for certain pieces like gentle classical.  But Shostakovich and Bartok are harsher, and there the sound would not be warm.  Those pieces are gritty and hard sounding.  A confusing factor is the wooden stage floor and walls, carpeting in the hall, all of which soften and warm the sound.  I have been in Boston Symphony Hall close to the stage, which is not as warm as Carnegie Hall.  Boston has no carpet on the floor or plush seats.  Carnegie is the opposite.