We Vinyl Ultrasonic or Vacuum Cleaner?


I have been working at rebuilding my Windham Hill collection. Many times I can find sealed copies versus used. My preference is for sealed if the price is sane. 
 

The question is with new copies, is there any advantage of running them through a CleanerVinyl 132kHz ultrasonic tank versus my OkkiNokki vacuum cleaner? 
 

Any thoughts on the subject are appreciated.

neonknight

@dogberry I too have a Loricraft. Never thought about an ultrasonic clean after as I thought that the Loricraft 4(pre SME version) with its hospital grade pump was good enough. I guess that you notice a big difference using the Degritter afterwards vs the Loricraft alone? Ever try only the Degritter? 

Perhaps the Degritter is something I should consider. How long from start to finish does your complete cleaning proceedures take. Are you using the new Mark II model? 

Do you use the L'art Du Son with your Loricraft and your Degritter? 

Thanks!

@neonknight which ultrasonic do you have?  My HumminGuru takes little to no effort to use so I was confused about your comment about how much commitment was required for your ultrasonic clean.

My prior Happy Buy (which is similar to the Vevor many people mention) took all kinds of time and effort which is why I moved on from that product.  It sounds like that may be what you are using?  I would highly suggest looking at a single disc ultrasonic, as they require almost no effort at all.

@vinylshadow I have a PRC-4 Deluxe (pre-SME) and Degritter MkI, and I have used them in all sorts of combinations, settling on using the Loricraft first with L'Art du Son liquid followed by a DW rinse. The Degitter I use with DW alone afterwards (on Heavy) so there is no need for another rinse. I then replace the inner sleeve with a new one. I do this with all records once and then repeat only when I notice any surface noise. The Degritter definitely adds something, and it is rare that a record has any remaining noise, and if one does it is usually a scratch rather than dirt. Either machine alone is about 80-85% as good. The whole process probably takes 20 minutes per disk and is done before the first play.

Seems to be par for the course. We get a TOTL choice that costs eye watering money, or we get a choice from budget conscious sellers that sells for minimum cost and performance, and little to nothing in between. 

Spent a bit of time looking at the Humminguru and it looks like a Degritter, but has the power levels of a Vevor tank or less. Perhaps the smaller wash chamber offsets the power needs. But not even a shadow of the ultrasonic strength.

Have yet to get a new record that isn't already dirty. There is usually a film on the record. Also packed in cheap paper, so bit of that on the record as well. 

First thing I do when opening up a new record, clean it, then put new sleeves on the inner and outer parts. 

The couple times a new uncleaned record has been played, my needle had crud all over after one side. On time thought it was a bad recording, turns out it was a dirty needle