Striking a balance between musicality and resolution


As my years and experience in this hobby continue to grow I notice a divergence between those seeking extreme resolution and detail from their music reproduction systems and those in search of maximum musicality.

In theory, high-end audio systems should provide more than garden variety stereo systems. In my view that means more detail and information should be heard from a high-end music reproduction system than one hears from ordinary HiFi stereo systems set ups. BUT is there such thing as too much resolution and detail in a stereo system’s sound presentation?

Some people feel that a less detailed presentation that is easier for your brain to process has better flow and provides more enjoyable listening.

So there is the dichotomy. Should one pay more to hear less? Can a frequency response performance that is curtailed at both frequency extremes be desired and praised?

Those that seek a “more musical” presentation usually point to their belief that that is how they hear live un-amplified acoustic music in the real world. In nature, high frequencies attenuate and decay with distance from the source and sound waves get absorbed, diffracted, reflected, and diffused by the environmental factors and landscapes; so they are not wrong in stating that in the real world the sound of music is less detailed and extended. The issue is that when we listen to our music reproduction systems at home we are not listening to live un-amplified music in a concert venue, but rather professionally produced audio recordings typically recorded with close-microphones techniques.

So the question is, do we want our systems to reproduce the sound on the commercial audio recordings accurately or does one want hear the sound the way one thinks that it should sound?

Lucky for me, I have enough systems at home that I have been able to design, set up, and tune them for different targeted resultant sound, sound presentation, and sound qualities. For instance, my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system is a dissecting microscope, my Pinnacle horn system aims at extreme musicality, and my WAAR reference system is a chameleon, which can be adjusted to sound exactly how you want it to sound in real-time.

My “test-bed” system takes on the sound character and sound qualities of the components in use and it is excellent for evaluating what new components have to offer or bring to the table in terms of sound qualities. But with the Acapella TW-1S ION plasma super-tweeters extending the high frequencies, the TBI Emperor subwoofers extending the low frequencies, and the highly detailed & nuanced Digital Audio Denmark AX24 DSD dac streaming HQPLAYER as the source, the “Test Bed” system is a highly resolving system.

As with everything else in life, is there a happy medium or compromise that gives you the best of those worlds? I believe that there is and that great music reproduction systems can be tuned to strike a balance between musicality and resolution. If one listens to the evolution of my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system for instance you can hear that the fine tuning is driving the sound in that direction.

So during last night’s listening session I adjusted the sound of my “Test Bed” system to a more musical sound presentation. The “Test Bed” system is always in flux so it allows me to experiment, explore, tweak, tune, and have fun with it.

Here is an audio recording from last night’s listening session that captures the revised sound presentation and conveys the sound qualities that exemplify a more organic sound versus a more delineated & resolved sound presentation:
 

The Way It Goes

 

carlos269

Carlos,sorry but you are brougth more bs by your self.

 

You are seared " there " and nothing more as @jrareform :  they're happy that's all that matters to me.  SO be happy as you are. Who cares but you ! ! ! ! 

 

R.

On the enjoyment part I can agree. Enjoying and being happy about whatever sound you are getting at the listening chair is the ultimate goal. The only reason I broght the adjustments up is because @jrareform brought up power solutions and amplifiers changes, which are trial & error options that in my view are shooting in the dark when predictable solutions with latitude are available if you can gain the knowledge. Now I realize that taking out one’s credit card is a lot easier than learning a new subject matter but the option is there.

As Joseph Campbell said, the brain is just another organ. It doesn't control who we are. I have long ago realized that I am controlled by far more than my brain. Joseph Campbell calls it the "heart," so for our purposes I will also. When I "evaluate" equipment, I listen to my heart, and I usually know within a minute what I like and don't like. Years ago I listen to an expensive Dynaudio speaker, and I knew immediately it was too cold for me. When I heard Sonus Faber speakers, I said, "This porridge" is just right. 

Now, where does the head come in? There is an element of seduction in audio and music. Sometimes we're seduced by things that warm the cockles of our hearts only to find out later that somethng like a seductive midrange hid a tzzy treble and bloated bass. That happened to me with the ARC LS22 Preamp. I fell in love with its very bloomy midrange. Only to find out later about the bass and treble. So, I guess I'm saying listen to your heart first, then do a deeper dive into specs or just listening harder to all aspects of the music. 

@audio-b-dog 

I think we’ve all had the experience of being initially seduced by a particular aspect of a piece of gear only to find after more extended listening that other, less appealing aspects emerge. 

If I’m fixated on correcting/improving a specific characteristic of my system’s presentation and audition something that that provides said improvement but also affects the system negatively in some other way, my strong desire  to find a solution may cause me to inadvertently magnify the pros and gloss over the cons. Most of the time I’m able to catch myself but sometimes not. For me, it's important to put in sufficient listening time, utilizing a range of material, and preferably, in comparison to another component, before arriving at any conclusions.

 

stuartk  I think we’ve all had the experience of being initially seduced by a particular aspect of a piece of gear only to find after more extended listening that other, less appealing aspects emerge. 

For me, it's important to put in sufficient listening time, utilizing a range of material, and preferably, in comparison to another component, before arriving at any conclusions.

Aural memory is fragile. And 2 sounds comparison is harder if they are timely separated. So, I record the sounds with a cam or cellphone. Repeat listening before and after recordings makes easy to find which is better. Alex/Wavetouch audio