I never thought that good sound was about details and resolution first and last...
This is preposterous...
Comparison from youtube videos is comical especially when people think that their uncontrolled living room is good as it is and more, better than most ...I learned it by acoustics experiments, not buying gear pieces or modifying them.
![]()
Good sound is about "timbre" natural and realist perception as recorded by the audio engineer and it is about the way they are translated by our system/room under acoustics control, not just with passive treatment, but even with mechanical or DSP control and parameters (ideally from inner ears and HTRF measures ).
There is 5 factors defining timbre perception and their related parameters controls , none of them is resolution or details ( which is associated mostly with marketing)..
When we tune a system/room together we dont look for resolution "per se" as an objective , we look for the different ways to make the trade-off recording choices of the audio engineer recording a live event, something which could be perfectly or optimally translated in our system room...(not details per se but timbre quality of the recording translated into timbre quality perceived in our room)
Speaking about resolution as first and last criteria for a system in a non acoustically prepared living room is only gear marketing legacy conditioning consumers mind to think that buying this or that will be enough, no need for complex acoustics, "our product is perfect", proof: listen to it on youtube...![]()

