@flash56 Stiff upper lip, my man! You're on a good path.
Great, great post.
Striking a balance between musicality and resolution
As my years and experience in this hobby continue to grow I notice a divergence between those seeking extreme resolution and detail from their music reproduction systems and those in search of maximum musicality.
In theory, high-end audio systems should provide more than garden variety stereo systems. In my view that means more detail and information should be heard from a high-end music reproduction system than one hears from ordinary HiFi stereo systems set ups. BUT is there such thing as too much resolution and detail in a stereo system’s sound presentation?
Some people feel that a less detailed presentation that is easier for your brain to process has better flow and provides more enjoyable listening.
So there is the dichotomy. Should one pay more to hear less? Can a frequency response performance that is curtailed at both frequency extremes be desired and praised?
Those that seek a “more musical” presentation usually point to their belief that that is how they hear live un-amplified acoustic music in the real world. In nature, high frequencies attenuate and decay with distance from the source and sound waves get absorbed, diffracted, reflected, and diffused by the environmental factors and landscapes; so they are not wrong in stating that in the real world the sound of music is less detailed and extended. The issue is that when we listen to our music reproduction systems at home we are not listening to live un-amplified music in a concert venue, but rather professionally produced audio recordings typically recorded with close-microphones techniques.
So the question is, do we want our systems to reproduce the sound on the commercial audio recordings accurately or does one want hear the sound the way one thinks that it should sound?
Lucky for me, I have enough systems at home that I have been able to design, set up, and tune them for different targeted resultant sound, sound presentation, and sound qualities. For instance, my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system is a dissecting microscope, my Pinnacle horn system aims at extreme musicality, and my WAAR reference system is a chameleon, which can be adjusted to sound exactly how you want it to sound in real-time.
My “test-bed” system takes on the sound character and sound qualities of the components in use and it is excellent for evaluating what new components have to offer or bring to the table in terms of sound qualities. But with the Acapella TW-1S ION plasma super-tweeters extending the high frequencies, the TBI Emperor subwoofers extending the low frequencies, and the highly detailed & nuanced Digital Audio Denmark AX24 DSD dac streaming HQPLAYER as the source, the “Test Bed” system is a highly resolving system.
As with everything else in life, is there a happy medium or compromise that gives you the best of those worlds? I believe that there is and that great music reproduction systems can be tuned to strike a balance between musicality and resolution. If one listens to the evolution of my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system for instance you can hear that the fine tuning is driving the sound in that direction.
So during last night’s listening session I adjusted the sound of my “Test Bed” system to a more musical sound presentation. The “Test Bed” system is always in flux so it allows me to experiment, explore, tweak, tune, and have fun with it.
Here is an audio recording from last night’s listening session that captures the revised sound presentation and conveys the sound qualities that exemplify a more organic sound versus a more delineated & resolved sound presentation:
- ...
- 512 posts total
Dear @mahgister : With all respect and in good shape too the first timeI saw your Agon virtual system fullof resonators I really " laughing " for a few minutes because for me was " out of mine mind " by " ignorance " if you wish. After that first " entertaiment " I read some of your post and always posted the same with no audiophile real contribution in an audio forum where 100% of the gentlemans at least once post about a gear device:any when you never deven mention about. Post after repeated posts you already made and stated very clearly your " ideas " and in your virtual system you already posted your rules but never is enough foryou and follow posting exactly the same you are posted millions of times. Obviously that you are not tired with and that you will follow doing due that's your privilege and what makes you happy and where you feel are seated in your confort chair. Fine with me. I wish that some time I can learn something from you to improve my listen MUSIC sessions but I think that that never will happen because this is the last thread whereI be reading your same bla, bla, bla, bla,
R. As I posted in this thread:to each his own. |
@toddalin I’m not sure why this design suddenly came up in the context of this topic, but I just wanted to offer a few of my comments, for what it’s worth. First, I see the issue that the design chooses drivers with widely different impedances like 4 Ω for the tweeter, 16 Ω for the midrange, and 8 Ω for the woofer. Unless you have a very specific reason and are ready for a complex crossover design, this will create design challenges and is generally not recommended. On top of that, you also need to level the volume difference between the AMT and midrange using an L-pad or resistor network.
Makes the magic happen:
|
You are looking at the results of several years of literally dozens of modifications using both an RTA and my ear to get these to sound as they do. I’ve been to T.H.E Show and other places and these compete with the best of what is out there, probably better if it were to be played in MY ROOM with no eq or room correction or fancy stuff backing it up. No Lpad is necessary because everything is matched through included resistors, (they were used in prior iterations). BION, a resistor placed BEFORE a second order or higher network will affect the volume level, but not the crossover slope. I have demonstrated this on another site. R1 and R3 work to remove "Q" from the drivers and the values are extremely important. R7 takes the Heil up to 8 ohms. And mine are the only Heils in the world with my modifications. Even the capacitors, both pass-through and conjugate, are chosen for their sound. |
@carlos269 This statement is false unless you have access to the master file prior to added DSP. If not, then you are not in the same position as the mastering engineer. If a digital release, he is the one who uses DSP to limit, compress (both used mostly with the understanding it will be played in a car), add EQ and of course apply normalization.
YT is a terrible place to do any sort of assessment at all. The recording system can be quite varied (smartphones are bad at that as they have limiting and compression, and their tiny little mics are no good at capturing bass), where the microphones are placed is a big deal and YT itself has a compression algorithm. The biggest variable is the room itself. YT videos of people's sound systems are an unfortunate waste of memory.
Actually, they don't.
That's the definition of the Absolute Sound I've always used.
|
- 512 posts total