Striking a balance between musicality and resolution


As my years and experience in this hobby continue to grow I notice a divergence between those seeking extreme resolution and detail from their music reproduction systems and those in search of maximum musicality.

In theory, high-end audio systems should provide more than garden variety stereo systems. In my view that means more detail and information should be heard from a high-end music reproduction system than one hears from ordinary HiFi stereo systems set ups. BUT is there such thing as too much resolution and detail in a stereo system’s sound presentation?

Some people feel that a less detailed presentation that is easier for your brain to process has better flow and provides more enjoyable listening.

So there is the dichotomy. Should one pay more to hear less? Can a frequency response performance that is curtailed at both frequency extremes be desired and praised?

Those that seek a “more musical” presentation usually point to their belief that that is how they hear live un-amplified acoustic music in the real world. In nature, high frequencies attenuate and decay with distance from the source and sound waves get absorbed, diffracted, reflected, and diffused by the environmental factors and landscapes; so they are not wrong in stating that in the real world the sound of music is less detailed and extended. The issue is that when we listen to our music reproduction systems at home we are not listening to live un-amplified music in a concert venue, but rather professionally produced audio recordings typically recorded with close-microphones techniques.

So the question is, do we want our systems to reproduce the sound on the commercial audio recordings accurately or does one want hear the sound the way one thinks that it should sound?

Lucky for me, I have enough systems at home that I have been able to design, set up, and tune them for different targeted resultant sound, sound presentation, and sound qualities. For instance, my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system is a dissecting microscope, my Pinnacle horn system aims at extreme musicality, and my WAAR reference system is a chameleon, which can be adjusted to sound exactly how you want it to sound in real-time.

My “test-bed” system takes on the sound character and sound qualities of the components in use and it is excellent for evaluating what new components have to offer or bring to the table in terms of sound qualities. But with the Acapella TW-1S ION plasma super-tweeters extending the high frequencies, the TBI Emperor subwoofers extending the low frequencies, and the highly detailed & nuanced Digital Audio Denmark AX24 DSD dac streaming HQPLAYER as the source, the “Test Bed” system is a highly resolving system.

As with everything else in life, is there a happy medium or compromise that gives you the best of those worlds? I believe that there is and that great music reproduction systems can be tuned to strike a balance between musicality and resolution. If one listens to the evolution of my OKTAN6 ultimate horn system for instance you can hear that the fine tuning is driving the sound in that direction.

So during last night’s listening session I adjusted the sound of my “Test Bed” system to a more musical sound presentation. The “Test Bed” system is always in flux so it allows me to experiment, explore, tweak, tune, and have fun with it.

Here is an audio recording from last night’s listening session that captures the revised sound presentation and conveys the sound qualities that exemplify a more organic sound versus a more delineated & resolved sound presentation:
 

The Way It Goes

 

carlos269

To be clear, the best systems are both relaxed and detailed. Detail must not come at the cost of brightness and harshness. 

Agree 100%.   That is what the best systems in fact sound like.  The conclusion that you can only have one or the other is false. 

Whether or not one cares.... totally up to you. 

 

Musicality and Resolution.  I think you can have both.  I think there is a debate because "Resolution" systems can sound "thin" and maybe "harsh".  This can be due to a number of factors..  Too many to discuss in this post...  Note: I think this is why you see some high end speakers not having perfectly flat frequency response.  For example, the speaker manufacturer may be seeking to address both topics and there are ways to boost certain frequencies to address "thin", and to use specific tweeters or tuning to address "harsh".  Another example could be tube amps - which may make the speaker highs sound "less harsh".  Other Examples that can address the synergy, could be different types of digital front ends, preamps, room treatments, sub woofers, cables, etc.... 

@carlos269  That's funny. I'll organize a yard sale for my gear immediately based on your suggestion. Not at all surprised you would start with the insults if someone has an opinion with which you disagree-Always persuasive. But you are right, I missed the subtle differences in "inner detail." 

I guess we have two choices. A. Your theory that I can't hear. Practicing internet, long distance audiology I suppose . B. Recording music played by your system on whatever you use to record it and uploading it on YouTube and then YouTube doing to the file whatever it is they do to your files and presumably every other file uploaded to YouTube and then downloading it to my computer and playing it back on my computer which does who knows what to it pretty much alters the sound produced by your system such as to make critical comparison impossible.

You have every right to your opinion, but I'm going with "B"

@atmasphere @mapman Read the response from Pat McGinty, of Kestrel Loudspeakers, an excellent contribution to this discussion topic: Pat McGinty from Kestrel Loudspeakers excellent contribution to the discussion topic

Pat highlights the importance of coherence to musicality and how one can sacrifice and live without stellar resolution to achieve higher musicality.

In every case better resolution means more musicality: more leading edge, more reverb, more decay, more spaciousness. Conversely edginess and stridency are the result of distortion, not resolution. In order to get musicality you need good rendition of harmonics resulting from overtones being transmitted with phase coherence and lack of distortion. So resolution and musicality are synonymous rather than opposite ends of the spectrum