Sometimes Hard to Drive Speakers are a Gimmick


Hello friends!! 

After about 10 years of looking at speaker impedance curves and sometimes doing an in depth analysis I've come to the strong inference that sometimes speakers are made hard to drive deliberately.  

I wrote about it more fully here. 

TL;DR : Don't be seduced by hard to drive speakers.  They aren't more musical. 

erik_squires

@audition__audio  - Gonna sit here and wait for you to provide anything amounting to evidence before I address that you are ignoring mine.  Selectively counting retorts ain't it.  

Please, all, keep replying to this thread to keep it active and get as many eyeballs as possible. 

@atmasphere 

Many amps can drive difficult loads but that isn’t the same as saying they are sounding their best while doing so. For one thing, distortion is higher. It may not seem like much, but since our ears are tuned to using higher ordered harmonics to sense sound pressure the slight increase in distortion is heard as a less relaxed, less authoritative and less detailed presentation. 

Put another way, if you want the most out of your amplifier dollar investment, it will be best served by using a speaker that is easy to drive and more efficient. Amps sound best when they loaf for a living rather than working hard. 

I don’t think speaker designers make speakers harder to drive on purpose so much as they just don’t know any better because they don’t also design amps. 

I agree with everything Ralph (atmasphere) said here.  The one thing to keep in mind is the first word of my post: "Sometimes."  

I agree some speakers are just.. unfortunately poor crossover choices.  Some speakers, by nature of the  physics of their construction are never going to be an easy load.  I’m also not going to whine about speakers that squeeze in a 3rd woofer in a small cabinet to get a little more bass out of a small footprint speaker.  Balancing out sensitivity and size requires tough engineering decisions and not what I'm trying to point out here. 

My article, and frustration, is about a third and very rare situation, of which in my years of looking at speakers I’ve found only 3 possible candidates. 

Hi Erik, I think a most famous amp burner was the Infinity Kappa 9 with essentially a reactor in the woofer circuit. Huge capacitance in series and big shunt coil.

In crossover experiments, I can't escape the fact that complex crossovers have an audible penalty of truncating the decay and making each driver only carry an unnatural sounding limited range. So your ear has to stitch together the sound.

Another strange thing I had found was that wiring identical drivers in series makes the imaging drift and it was better to parallel and add resistance. Apparently the inductance of the voice coils creates perhaps a phase shift favoring one driver over the other in complex waveform.

I have never heard a 4th order I liked, the less you can get away with the better. Also each shunt element is consuming amplifier power and making back EMF to some extent. Speaker building can be the most frustrating yet most rewarding thing when it finally dials in..

@audition__audio - Seems like you actually skipped my post and the blog where the data is kept.  Maybe start there.