Rediscovering records


I have a large collection of records (about 2000-3000) but  culled about 200-300 to play over and over again through the years.  I picked the best sounding ones when I had a mediocre analog setup because I thought most of the collection sounded poor. Some time ago I did a major upgrade to my record playing system (about $8000 worth) but still listened to the few hundred exclusively. Just recently I started to listen to the rest of the collection and discovered to my delight that most sounded wonderful.  The better equipment changed my listening habits dramatically.

rvpiano

@rvpiano 

There can also be short or long classical music

The exception always breaks the rule, but I can't think of many 'classical' music pieces that are under 8 minutes long ...

@rvpiano I agree, and the distortions in microgrooves pose real problems.  That said, I've found that most good vintage pressings do pretty well, if you allow for a certain degree of tolerance.  OTOH, I'm sorry to say that a well-done digital remastering from master tapes eliminates many issues.

You need to find a music loving friend, locally, hopefully an Audiophile.

There are many jazz compositions that run over 8 minutes owing mostly to improvisation by each musician, but time duration is still a faulty way to define a genre. I’m fine with “classical”. Like “pornography”, I can’t define it but I know it when I hear/see it.

This reminds me of an argument I had with a person years ago.  It started something like this.  I said that although I am primarily a jazz person, I also like Baroque music and even some Early Western music.  The reply was, oh yes I like Classical music too.  To which I replied that Classical music was from a later period than I was referring to.  The conversation quickly devolved from there.