Rediscovering records


I have a large collection of records (about 2000-3000) but  culled about 200-300 to play over and over again through the years.  I picked the best sounding ones when I had a mediocre analog setup because I thought most of the collection sounded poor. Some time ago I did a major upgrade to my record playing system (about $8000 worth) but still listened to the few hundred exclusively. Just recently I started to listen to the rest of the collection and discovered to my delight that most sounded wonderful.  The better equipment changed my listening habits dramatically.

rvpiano

@richardbrand  

You’re quite right.

The term “Classical” can be used to describe a short period in music history or, generically, as a term for Western art music in general.  It can be confusing. 


 It describes not just orchestral music, but all kinds of art music (solo, chamber,   song, cantata,  etc.). There can also be short or long classical music.

@rvpiano 

There can also be short or long classical music

The exception always breaks the rule, but I can't think of many 'classical' music pieces that are under 8 minutes long ...

@rvpiano I agree, and the distortions in microgrooves pose real problems.  That said, I've found that most good vintage pressings do pretty well, if you allow for a certain degree of tolerance.  OTOH, I'm sorry to say that a well-done digital remastering from master tapes eliminates many issues.

You need to find a music loving friend, locally, hopefully an Audiophile.

There are many jazz compositions that run over 8 minutes owing mostly to improvisation by each musician, but time duration is still a faulty way to define a genre. I’m fine with “classical”. Like “pornography”, I can’t define it but I know it when I hear/see it.