Is ASR for real, or is it only for those sub $1k or even sub $2K?

My issue with ASR primarily is that many of the people who post there are hypocrites.  They quibble over THD or SNR of -100 db vs 120 db, yet they say that tests "prove" people can't tell the difference between -60 SINAD vs -100.  So they quibble about "state of the art" while essentially proving the "science" part of their argument wrong, considering that we humans can't hear a difference, or so the logic goes.

The moment I realized how wrong their methodology in determining worthwhile equipment when I tested a lower performing by numbers amplifier against one of their latest and greatest hypex units from VTV amplifiers.  It sounded so brittle and harsh next to amplifiers from Parasound and Primare.  There was no question what I was hearing in my system was unequivocally better to anyone with halfway decent listening skills.

I think it largely has to do with group think bias where people believe that the measurements are all there is, so anyone who disagrees must be wrong.  And they believe that anything Amir says must be right because he is like their religious figure saving them from the masses of "idiots" that spend money on expensive gear.  Give me a break.

The measurements are the only good part about ASR.  I like a flatter frequency response in my speakers.  The flatter the better typically.  So that portion does have some merit.  Low and behold though, the best performing models are not cheap when it comes to response and distortion.  Which for some reason they give smaller kefs and genelecs a pass when it comes to distortion, but other companies they destroy over a small perturbation in the frequncy response.

Stay away from the religion of ASR and use them for their measurements ONLY which should not be your only determinant in choosing gear IMHO

Here it goes again. Never ending. Did we gain anything from having this kind of confrontational, non-constructive discussion? Is it even worth bringing up this figure for any meaningful conversation? If you want to stay away, then stay away for good.

I honestly do not think ASR are "cheapskates" or focus excessively on cheap for cheap’s sake. I think it is wholly misplaced faith in a few measurable parameters as representing musical sound quality. They love measuring parameters and creating charts and graphs (I understand the love of this... I used to be a scientist).  But sound quality is the result of many dozens of variables... most of which they do not measure. The ear is an unbelievably sensitive listening device, especially when coupled with the mind. Measuring a few parameters of components tells little about how humans with hear the sound quality.

This is so basic to high end audio... like the first thing I learned back in the 1970’s when comparing specifications to what I heard. It became obvious the with the exception of a few specs that were useful in getting the big picture... watts per channel and current, for instance, and specifications like noise and many others are completely useless.  But mostly it iis errors of omission. 

Was all this copied and pasted from this forum from about a year ago? Asking for a friend. ;-)

And heck yeah, a $200 SMSL DAC measures better than a $10K Tambaqui DAC. If anyone with a Mola Mola Tambaqui wants to swap, just let me know.  I’ll even pay shipping. 

I like to visit ASR for shots of a products guts, so I can determine how easily I may make changes to components.  But otherwise as a gentleman names s_cody once said, "oscilloscopes and digital volt meters dont listen to music, people do."