Vibration Isolation for equipment using granite?


I recently visited a high-end audio salon and in the course of discussions with the owner, we discussed the large number of black granite 18x18" blocks he had against the wall. He said that he dealt with a granite retailer to make them from scrap granite pieces from kitchen installations, etc. He said that all equipment (amps, pre-amps, cd platers, DACs, streamers, turntables, etc.) all seemed to benefit from having them underfoot, even on quality equipment racks. It made me wonder if this was true or snake oil? I have my equipment (except power amp) on a Standesign equipment rack with each MDF shelf resting on small aluminum cones that "isolate" it from the steel frame. Question is, does this just add mass which would or wouldn't dissipate the vibration energy or does it work (maybe on another principal). And would sandstone or marble drink coasters, especially with cork soles) work better? Has anyone tried ay of this? Thanks in advance.

cooperdude6

Using heavy material for equipment racks does have some acoustic benefit rooted in physics, but using solid material like marble also presents risks if used alone.  The theory of using heavy materials is termed mass loading.  Adding mass increases inertia, an objects resistance to change in motion.  The equipment rack will become more resistant to vibrations from the floor and air because it becomes harder to set into vibrational movement.  
 

All materials have a resonant frequency - a frequency that easily sets the material into vibrational movement.  Mass loading also is used to move the resonant frequency outside of the audible range and providing damping of the energy.
 

Marble provides a solid flat surface for coupling equipment to the rack so vibrations from the equipment are transmitted to the rack.  
 

So why does marble alone fail in theory?  Vibration travels through solid material easier than liquids, liquid easier than gas.  The marble will be subject ringing and resonant frequencies, and easily transmit the ringing to the equipment by coupling.  This will be audible most probably as muddling detail and high frequency distortion.  Most equipment racks that use mass loading will use sand, which acts to present the befits of mass loading while also having “liquid” properties to effect changing the resonant frequency and damping.  
 

The best vibration management systems combine the use of mass loading and damping.  

I am not arguing that a solid stone rack takes away the benefit of good chassis feet. On the contrary, it can be argued the the better the rack, the better the (best) feet can perform. I am only saying that stock feet will perform better too (for example, on my MA-1 amps, or Aesthetix Io preamp). The rack itself offers much more stability and mass, compared to what I had before. My overall impression is that superior stability and mass translate to authority and precision in the sound. 

Before, I had a VPI record player needing a lot of tweaks to perform its best, including a Bright star sand box. And even some air in a bike tube. Endless tweaking. I changed to a Hanss T-30 player with adjustable "maglev" suspension. This stands direct on the top rack stone shelf. No looking back. 

Mass stores vibration [energy] and thus does NOT dampen it. 

What you want is tuned dampeners (eg springs) on a light and stiff platform (or screwed in, such as isoAcoustic Gaias on a speaker, with the proper version of the Gaias depending on the mass of the speaker).

Tuned meaning matched properly to the load. You obviously need a lot stiffer dampers for a 120 lbs speaker vs. a 50 lbs amplifier vs. a 10 lbs turntable. 

I don't know if using granit with amps or TT  can improve sound but it definitely improved the sound when used under my Dynaudio Contour Legacy even if they have cast iron bottom integrated plates. The bass is tighter among others. Used 3/4 inch. Worth testing on other components.