Everything you said is already in your first message, which I was agreeing with already and i said it, but i added new things you don’t see and instead of being curious you decided to reject all that as "non sense" . So now you’re repeating it in a second post to object my own interpretation with arguments that in no way contradict what I’m talking about.But you are interested in getting a point over me not by my opinion and what i means. ![]()
Your definition of an agent is purely ideological and materialistic. It’s not false, just a half-truth...
You are free to analyze AI in the closed system of your choice, namely human society, but the universe didn’t wait for us to create artificial intelligence. So there’s much more to it than a simple political struggle.
You misinterpreted my assertion of large-scale artificial intelligence by talking about "inevitability." I was talking about freedom and the collective and individual consciousness necessary for understanding the tripartite human social fabric instead of the absurd binary oppositions: matter-spirit, left-right, capitalism-communism, etc.I was preoccupied by the fact our social fabric is immature . We are on the brink of many crisis right now.
You are projecting your own rejection of the spirit onto my message; many of our contemporaries are techno-cultists, if not materialists.It seems you are one.
"Nanobrain" is a scientific work whose core is mathematical. It doesn’t talk about cosmic AI but about the mathematical rules necessary to create an autonomous brain.( an autonomous consciousness not just an intelligent agent)
Otherwise, you are stating the obvious, and anyone can only agree with the obvious me included.
Goethe’s Faust is not just a lesson about visible powers, which would make the work trivial if that were the case.
Since you don’t subscribe to any spiritual vision, everything I’ve said and alluded to can only be seen as mythology.
For my part, all your talk, which I naturally agree with—we are free and masters of our destiny—is nothing but common place evidence. Like every major event in history, AI is a spiritual test whose goal is the elevation of consciousness.
You don’t like the word "spiritual," so everything I say is mythological nonsense.
You haven’t read "Nanobrain," and you declare that if "my little brain" can’t pass this test, neither can the author of "Nanobrain" but you and humanity can... that last line reveals a bit of insincerity and is a bit insulting...![]()
Read "nanobrain" and come back, and we will be able to speak about artificial consciousness and human consciousness, A.C. is not A. I. (not just artificial intelligence or AGI to come) and we will be able to speak about their difference, mathematically speaking.
A clue: the difference between artificial consciousness mathematically speaking and Natural living consciousness is not explained as such in this book, then you would be dependent on my opinion to get it explicitly, it is related to number theory (another clue) ... But read it and come back explaining it to me and i will takes your rejection of my opinion seriously...
My "Nanobrain" work well ...![]()
I am curious to know why you dont even questionned me about the name of the scientist investigating consciousness i read, the name of the dude observing aliens actions, or the name of the seer who speak also the same discourse , these three did not even know one another. Why not one minute of curiosity instead of a rebuttal of my discourse?
It is easy to know why...
![]()

