The best reference is live music


For those of you who love classical music and care about imaging in your audio system, I recommend that you check out a San Francisco area group called Voices of Music.

They video record all of their performances and have most all of it on YouTube and free to access.  They are extremely well engineered recordings and more than worthy for the very finest audio systems.  What makes these recordings especially *useful*, as well as enjoyable, is that being video, you can see where all of the musicians are.  The best reference in audio is live performance.  Does  your system do an honest job of recreating the live performance?  Does your system give an image that at all matches what you see on the video?

Beyond this issue, Voices of Music is worthy to experience because they are very different from the large symphonic performances that most classical listeners hear.  Instead of the SF Symphony with 100 musicians, Voices of Music will typically have about 8 to 12 players.  There are some larger ensembles and some smaller.

They are an "early music" ensemble.  Just as rock 'n roll evolved from the early 1950's to what we have today, what we call classical music evolved as well.  The instruments evolved too.  A 19th century violin (what the musicians call "modern") has a neck pulled back, has steel strings and is engineered to be louder than an 18th or 17th century violin, which has a straighter neck and gut strings.  They are in fact, different instruments.

An 18th century instrument will articulate better.  The bow is lighter and faster than a 19th century bow.  Trumpets of that period had no valves.  Neither did French horns.  Flutes were typically wooden and had open holes.  That period also had instruments completely absent from "modern" orchestras.  If you haven't listened to a 1st rate early music ensemble, you're in for a totally new experience.

russbutton

@russbutton Thank you for sharing a picture of your system. I second what @devinplombier said, your Linkwitz Orion speakers look great and are aesthetically appealing.

Although I have three different turntable systems here at home, I also almost exclusively am all digital these days. I stream both from my local library and from Tidal played back with HQPLAYER, controlled with the JPLAY iOS app.

How do your audio recordings sound played back on your systems, through the Linkwitz Orions? Is the sound you hear when playing back the recordings you made of your wife and the other ensembles representative of the sound you heard at location during the recording sessions?

@devinplombier The stock Orions have a rather Danish Modern look.  Nothing wrong with that, but at the time, I was living in a 1918 Craftsman bungalow and wanted them to have something of a Mission style look to them.  The local cabinet maker who made them up for me is also an audiophile and loudspeaker designer.  Quite brilliant.  Heʻs designed/built full range curve diaphram electrostatic loudspeakers, line arrays, horn systems as well as my Orions.  He is a close friend and has done a number of other things for me.  Today he spends most of his time rebuilding and servicing Quad loudspeakers.  Heʻs the guy who turned me onto Linkwitz.  He was the one who came up with this look of the Orions.

@carlos269  I like to think my recordings do sound very much like the original performance.  Hereʻs a recording I did with the Behringer mikes back in 2010 of the Brahms Clarinet Quintet.  I like to think the imaging is pretty representative of the performance.  The photos show both the ensemble and the mike location.

https://russbutton.com/recordings/tq/Brahms_Quintets_2010/Clarinet/

On the other hand...

I don't miss the coughing, the sneezing, the occasional vomiting in the aisle that were some of the fun times had at the BSO.

And thankfully when I had my season tickets, cell phones had not yet been invented ;)

 

Yesterday I wrote explaining the limitation imposed by microphones.  Today I want to point out another reason why our dream of having our systems provide a facsimile of live performance, while being a worthy endeavor, can not reach fruition.  It's the room itself of course.  Any musician can tell you that there are good rooms and bad rooms.  That is ones where everything sounds great and ones where the acoustics are so bad that the musicians have difficulty even hearing each other.  The unknown factor X in every discussion concerning audio is our listening room.  How would the performer(s) sound in your room compared to the room where the recording was made?  There is no way to know, but it is axiomatic that the answer is always that the sound is altered in unknowable ways.

You are right that the perfect mic is not invented yet. Though there is a huge improvement on mics that sound close to the original sound. 

Below is a recording (recorded by the most accurate sound mic) of the most accurate audio system playing a accurate sound recording recorded with the most accurate mic. ** Please remember. The audio system is playing the record which  the mic was 10 inches from the mouth. And this video mics are 6ft away from speakers. Alex/Wavetouch audio

WA-102 Mic vs. other mics, Wavetouch audio live recording

billstevenson     Let me warn you, though, that the microphone hasn't been invented yet that can accurately record a hi hat.  Now if you can't even get a simple hi hat right, how can you expect the whole band to accurately sound life like?  The simple answer is:  We're working on it.  Be happy, it's all good.