It Can't Be Explained Better


I just read this latest post from Dave Chesky at Audiophile Society, and I must  share it, as nothing I've read has better explained the phenomenon that may be behind the preference for vinyl playback so many of us have...

 

 

The World is a Bell, and it wants to RING!

Walk up to a piano, strike a single key, and listen closely. What you hear is not just a note — it’s a sympathetic vibration, a resonance that arises because the string naturally wants to vibrate at its fundamental frequency. The same happens with a guitar, a drum, a wine glass, or even a sheet of metal. Everything in our physical world has a resonant frequency, a natural mode of vibration, a note it wants to sing. The universe is, quite literally, a concert of ringing.
Audio reproduction is no different.


Your loudspeaker box is the most obvious example — a large resonant cavity with panels that flex and radiate sound in unintended ways. But it's not just the box. Your amplifier chassis, your cables, your digital-to-analog converter (DAC), even the circuit boards and power transformers — everything vibrates, and thus everything rings.


This became viscerally apparent to me recently in the studio while comparing linear-phase equalizers to minimum-phase EQs. Set to identical filter shapes, the sonic difference was striking. Linear-phase filters preserve phase relationships across the spectrum but introduce pre-ringing artifacts — a kind of temporal smear that occurs before the transient. Minimum-phase filters, by contrast, do all their damage after the transient, creating post-ringing that, while technically less "accurate," can feel more musically natural to the ear.


The ear can hear this ringing — not as an overt tone, but as a kind of blur, a clouding of the leading edge of a note, an inability to localize or feel immediacy. And this is just from a software filter. Now imagine the cumulative effect of every physical object in the playback chain doing its own version of ringing, from capacitors to cables, from enclosures to air gaps.


This may also explain why people still love vinyl. LP playback is, from a technical standpoint, riddled with flaws — mechanical noise, surface wear, channel crosstalk, limited dynamic range. And yet, it's emotionally engaging. Why?


Because analog never stops ringing. The cartridge, the stylus, the cantilever, the headshell, and the tonearm are all mechanical resonators that don't just start and stop. They sing along with the music. They fill in the gaps — not with data, but with sympathetic overtones and a kind of musical sugar that pleases the brain. There's a reason maple syrup and salt taste good together in the morning: we crave harmonic density. LPs, in a sense, continue the sound beyond the note — a sonic metaphor for warmth, continuity, and presence.


So what is accurate?


That’s the philosophical core of this discussion. You can measure a flat frequency response, perfect impulse behavior, or total harmonic distortion below 0.0001%. But no measurement can capture the cumulative psychoacoustic impact of all the materials, mechanics, and algorithms in your playback chain. The ringing, the resonance, the interactions — they are systemic and emergent, not linear or isolated.


The signal is not the music. The music is what happens after the signal passes through your chain of resonating objects and arrives in your emotionally perceptive brain.


So the question is not merely what is accurate, but rather:
What is beautiful? What is meaningful? What moves you?
Because in the end, the world is a bell — and it wants to ring.

- David Chesky

 

Thanks Dave.

audiodidact

"So we are supposed to have every piece of the playback chain ringing like Santa Claus on XMass Eve?  This seems pretty stupid to me."

Interesting.

In all my years of Christmases I can't recall a single time Santa rang the door bell...

 

Pretty sure ringing like a bell was always deemed as a thing to avoid in hifi land around these parts.   Have the times changed suddenly?  Wouldn’t surprise me.  Join the club!

If you believe that, then everything and anything "rings". Do you wear glasses when listening? Ringing. Have a watch on? Ringing. The chair you're sitting on? Ringing. Does anyone have even a minute amount of critical thought these days? Sheesh.

 A vibrating sound source communicate way more information about his material complex state to an Awaken perceptive subject or any trained ears that "what meet the eyes"... We envision a cavity in a wall by tapping into it... What does this means ? the "ringing" wall educate us...

This  "ringing" metaphor is just that a metaphor to convey for all a very deep truth, a truth about sound almost no one know consciously ...Chesky ears are trained one indeed...

Read this : 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267327268_The_Body-Image_Theory_of_Sound_An_Ecological_Approach_to_Speech_and_Music

I bought his book ... angelcool

 

«My mother trained me  to tap fruit with my fingers and listen to it»-- Anonymus Acoustician cool

 

 

Now ask yourself what is "timbre"?

The "ringing" of a complex (wood content and his state, form geometry, varnishes etc) sound source is perceived in details by the ears luthier. If the luthier was not able to hears the state of the material as "timbre" Stradivarius could not exist...

"timbre" experience is the real source of music with rythm...

But i will stop here ...angel

I believe Chesky used the term "bell" as a metaphor, not literally that everything rings in the same manner (or volume) as a bell, but yes, every single thing in our world that can vibrate has a resonant frequency. This shouldn't be an odd concept, especially on an audio forum.