+1 @hifiguy42
Exactly…
It Can't Be Explained Better
I just read this latest post from Dave Chesky at Audiophile Society, and I must share it, as nothing I've read has better explained the phenomenon that may be behind the preference for vinyl playback so many of us have...
|
|
+1 @hifiguy42 Exactly… |
I have a lot of respect for David Chesky, but: let's look closely at his argument, which the OP thinks "can't be explained better." Sure, everything resonates; "the world is a bell, and it wants to sing." But the singing world is not the music the musicians played—unless, plausibly, you mean the world in the immediate proximity of those musicians (the acoustics of the original venue). Your tonearm, your cartridge, your listening room, your speaker cabinets, your vinyl...these are NOT part of the original "ringing world." So, pretty obviously, the acoustic engineer's job is to MINIMIZE the extraneous resonances that were not part of the original recording in order to let that original "song" come through. In any case, why would the additional resonances introduced by vinyl playback enhance one's experience of a phenomenon that is already so full of uncontrollable resonances? Why would adding the "singing" of one's cartridge and its cantilever to the already complex resonance chamber that is your listening space somehow bring one closer to what the musicians actually played? Chesky's argument amounts to a bit of applied John Cage. But for that approach, the original music is almost superfluous. Just listen to the world sing! You don't really need the music or the musicians at all. |
Great post by Chesky! Thanks OP Once this is said i concur with newton_john: Myself i quitted vinyl long ago for many reasons, not because digital is superior...
|