I respect David Chesky’s opinion when it comes to recording but here however, I disagree with him. I am also not the only one. Here is how Rudy Van Gelder put it:
digital was “a total revolution in the way sound is recorded”. He added, “People really don’t understand how far-reaching that is yet. They’re comparing analog to digital but there’s no comparison. […] People ask me if I’m sentimental about the demise of the LP. Absolutely not. I’m glad to see it go”
You probably have heard of Rudy. His name is on a lot of your albums (Rudy Van Gelder Remastered). My personal opinion is that analog is old and has peaked long time ago. It was very good within its limitations (noise, fragility, cost). Digital is the new kid on the block and is yet to reach puberty but is already so strong. The CD was a poor representation of digital in its first iteration. The reason being that it’s 1s and 0s and people thought that’s all there is to it. It will always be accurate and basically perfect. We all know how crappy bad CD recordings can sound. On the other hand, CDs like Bill Evans’ “The Complete Live At The Village Vanguard” offer a window on what the format can do. Miles Davis’ “Someday My Prince Will Come” in DSD surpasses the LP in terms of musicality. At 68, I was born, raised and grew up listening to LPs, so I know that nostalgic feeling but, practically I had to let go. I own over 4 thousand albums and keep them on a hard drive that I can carry in my shirt pocket.
I truly believe that when digital reach its maturity, the LP will have no chance and the good news is that it will not take decades, but years. It will be like what we have witnessed between incandescent and LED bulbs. I bought some LED bulbs the other day that allows you to change the wattage and color temperature on the fly. Are you kidding me!!

