I agree that everybody has their own musical taste. And I think it’s all good because music of all types "soothes the soul."
This is a common place true fact nobody can contest...
All poetry and all music soothe the soul...
But how this fact is supposed to contradict my point about the "spiritual depth" of some musical pieces in all cultures and styles ?
The fact that i used Scriabin, an important composer, does not means i imposed my taste; i explained why i use him to describe the abyss between tonal music , atonal music and a genius who discover a third region where to live..
When we discuss we must be of good faith and dont use someone post to return it against him as "his taste" dictatorship instead of understanding what is the point of his argument...
If we dont understand something we must have the humility to say it and not killing the messenger ...
The fact that this "spiritual depth" in some music pieces is linked to "timbre" perception by our body and his relation to musical time as not measurable, is my main point to judge musicianship...
Is this means that i impose Scriabin or Ali Akbar Khan taste ?
No.... If you are of good faith ...