A principle guiding the wise audiophile life

So, I guess I trust my ears in the end, but I don't trust them without some skeptical testing and re-listening.

I act the same...

This is pretty basic stuff. The OP wants to convince everybody that you can buy a $500 amp but put a $10 worth of isolation feet on it, it will perform like the $60,000 amp. You know this isn’t possible.

I presume you are a remote viewer of a palm reader ?

If you are you read my mind in a distorted way....

i always specified that basic optimization is only that : basic optimization principle which apply to any system at any price...

Only an idiot will think that price never reflect the design quality  of a piece of gear than a better potential performance...I am not this one idiot...

only an idiot will claim that price is all there is to know about the gear before plug and play ... I am not this one idiot...

Read others mind ... Thanks...

only an uninformed person  will also  claim :

For good stuff it takes money.

Now after accusing me of repeating common place facts you yourself impose on us your "axiom" which is the most erroneous one peddled in all audio thread...

Sorry but optimizing a system /room is very complex job with his 3 working dimensions and buying costly acoustics panels do not replace acoustics controls ( complex one as filters or mechanical one as mine) and knowledge...

Buying is not enough...

And yes a low cost system can be relatively good when the designed parts are good and when they reach their optimum even if no peanuts cost system can replace very costlier one.... Am i in the obligation to repeat this in each post because a twisted mind reader will put falseties in my mouth ? 

To be clear i will repeat this : 

There is no relation between a piece of gear or a system/room before and after his optimal mechanical,electrical and acoustical installation. None.

This does not means that my 150 bucks dac will rival a many thousand bucks dac, nor that my 1000 bucks system will make Mike Lavigne or ghdprentice envious...

Is it clear enough for those who claim to read my mind ?

I hope so.... 

 It does means however that any well optimized system can beat  relatively costlier one IF they are not well optimized...

It does means  that for sure any low cost system even well optimized cannot beat a well optimised costlier system most of the times. because there is a justification for a higher cost price corresponding to a best design most of the times...

Another fact:

 We live an era of luck for audiophile...

We can afford very low cost gear with a minimal satisfaction acoustic threshold. My actual system is very good for his peanuts price ...

All low cost chinese,  save one vintage  from japan, but  2 German vintage headphones...

I had 4 conditioners / purifier/ clean power reserve.  8 homemade  grounding box, 2 Schumann generators, many homemade  Helmholtz resonators in my acoustic corner/room and  one linear power supply serving three gear pieces.

Peanuts costs and very good for what it is ...

I am happy with it, even if better exist, i learned how to install any system at any cost, but i bought vwhat i could afford...i am proud to have been able to learn acoustics concepts...

Acoustics panels are good enough for a living room but acoustics ask for more knowledge than just buying them...Thats my point...

If somebody has never been able to create at low cost a RELATIVELY good system/room , i am pretty sure he will not be able to optimize any costlier system too...

Why ?

 Because the three working dimensions to optimize are the same for any system at any cost...

 For sure there is at some level of price differences...

Using an acoustician to design a room dont compare to my mechanical tuning of a room...I did with what i have, the acoustician architect will create something new...

I hope no one will distort my message ....