Vinyl sounds better (shots fired)


I was bored today on a support job so I made a meme. This isn’t a hard or serious conviction of mine, but I am interested in getting reactions 😁

 

https://photos.app.goo.gl/SEHyirjJEaNXydfu9

medium_grade

@stealthdeburgo

I find it interesting that you mention both processing and compression. These were two big factors in me getting back into vinyl after a hiatus of four years. I regard that time as a failed experiment and a big misstep. My original decision was a matter of head over heart. It turned out that the heart had been right.

After a couple of years, I experienced remorse over selling my turntable despite upgrading the streaming capabilities of my system. Having seen the enthusiasm of friends and my sons for vinyl, I asked my dealer to lend me a Klimax LP12 that he had taken from a customer in part exchange. Its only difference to my old turntable was that it had the Urika II phono stage. This carries out the RIAA conversion in the digital domain. In tandem with the improved clock of my Klimax DSM /3 Hub, it made a huge difference to the sound quality of vinyl on an LP12. Despite the upgrades that I’d made to the streaming side, I found that generally vinyl trounced streaming on my system.

Now, there are some remastered records that don’t cut it in comparison to the original pressings. This appears to be down to poor mastering. It’s not just pop music that suffers from over compression - rock music and other genres are also affected. The crystal clarity that comes with the digital formats is not enough for me. I also need the excitement that vinyl can bring. Perhaps, classical music enthusiasts value different things in music reproduction. Certainly they were among the early adapters to CD due to the absence of surface noise. My reaction then was that the early CD experience also took away the (expletive deleted) music.

I can’t claim to understand what it is that gives vinyl its special quality, but to me it’s just more enjoyable particularly for prolonged listening sessions. It gets more thrilling as time passes, whereas streaming becomes slightly tiresome in comparison.

Post removed 

vinyl is highly processed in order to keep many issues at bay. and interestingly enough many people like the sound of that.

@stealthdeburgo This statement is false. Vinyl often gets some processing (such as mono bass for a few milliseconds at a time) or compression to reduce the engineering cost of the project. When I was running our mastering operation, I found that even with out of phase bass, if we simply spent enough time working on the project we could find a way around the issue without any processing at all. None of the recordings we turned out had any other than the normal RIAA pre-emphasis.

FWIW a typical LP mastering cost is about $500/hour. So you can see that anything to reduce the engineer's time could be valuable. All this comes down to the producer of the project; what sort of quality he's after and how much he's willing to spend to make it so.

Dear friends : In my last post I  posted about  ".fine tunning " room/system.

 

Even that no one of you makes any comment on that critical room/system characteristic  I think that maybe almost all the  vinyl oriented/biased  audiophiles have their room/systems fine tunned to vinyl and if this is true then could be the explanation or reason why biased to vinyl and not only say for example: digital is sterile with no " emotions "down there.

How and why the room/system is fine tunned is way important when analizing audio subjects as the one in this thread and obviously that subjectivity is the oter main reason.

Maybe we need a better equilibrium between objectivity and subjectivity, at least could help to all of us one way or the other.

 

R.