I forgot to add in my previous post: one of the coolest things about the Alons is their top to bottom coherence, almost like a planar. I defy anyone to find the crossover points listening to music. Playing many recordings this weekend, the other thing we've noticed is how they handled a large variety of music - everything we threw at 'em - with aplomb: large scale classical, choral, chamber music, rock, vocal, blues, big band, jazz trio, solo piano, etc. The Vandies are more forgiving, but I think ultimately I will be able to put together a really special system around the Alons. I know they're sure going to tell me EXACTLY what any new electronics I swap in sound like. For me, the extra homework is worth the ultimate reward. Your mileage may vary, and I have not heard the 3A's signature version, which may have addressed my reservations about the Vandies. But if you like the Dahlquist sound, I think you should try to hear the Alons. Good luck!
Vandersteen 3A OR Alon 2 MK2
HAS ANYONE HAD THESE TWO SPEAKERS IN THEIR OWN LISTENING ROOM? I AM LOOKING FOR OPINIONS IN YOUR ROOM WITH SAME ELECTRONICS AND ROOM TWEAKS AND TREATMENTS NECESSARY FOR EACH SPEAKER.I CURRENTLY OWN VANDERSTEEN 3A NOT SIGNATURES. I HAVE ALWAYS BEEN A DAHLQUIST FAN AND ALSO OWN DQ10 AND DQ20 SPEAKERS.I KNOW CARL WORKED WITH JON DAHLQUIST AND WONDER IF THE ALON WOULD BE A BETTER CHOICE. THANKS,RICH ANROOM
- ...
- 11 posts total
- 11 posts total