Seeking more 3d imaging, deeper/wider soundstage


I'm considering replacing either my amp or my pre. My system is profiled in my system link. Which do you think would improve soundstage/imaging more:
Replace the P3? I'd consider used McCormack, or a passive line stage, but my amp clips at 5v, which is what my DAC puts out when using the XLR outputs, and I'd like to try those someday...not sure a passive is a good fit for my system? Plus I require a remote. That's a deal breaker.
Replace the Rotel RB-1080? I'd consider parasound (a21 is a bit too pricey for me), used McCormack, odyssey, maybe even older krell or classe. I want XLR inputs tho.
Budget is $900-$1200 for either. Music spans the full gamut, excluding hip hop and country. Room is small, 12x12x8. I'm going to throw up some affordable foam acoustic absorption this summer (foam factory). Thnx in advance.
realremo
yes I have considered tubes in the pre. I don't think my speakers would work with a tube amp. I have been toying with the idea of picking up a set of Focals someday, the tube amp might follow that.
I updated my system pics to show the new location for the rack and speakers.
Read the article " Room with no boundaries" and if that peak your interests, Master Handbook of Room Acoustics.

Early reflection from nearby boundaries arrive early in time and high in intensity. Those are the clues that we are in a small space.

Use diffusors to spread out the 1st reflection over time and reduce the peak intensity. By having some component of the 1st reflection arriving later in time and lower in intensity, your ears are fooled into thinking that you are in a bigger space, where the reflections arrive later and softer in intensity.

Bass traps or absorption would not create a larger stage. It will create a more focused soundstage.

Using non absorptive diffusor to the side or behind the speakers can create sound source broadening but do this with care as soundstage can lose focus.

Use absorptive diffusor at the 1st reflection point of the contralateral speaker, this would cut your crosstalk (eg. reflection of the right speaker off the left wall into your left ear), and help with widening soundstage.

Cables, electronics, AC regeneration or conditioning may help but will not overcome the bottle neck in room acoustics.

Resonators may also help but but that would be a mean a second sound source and can alter spectral balance.
I'm not familiar with the specifics on the Quads, but 89dB and 6 Ohm nominal does not sound like a difficult load for, say, a 100 Watt push-pull tube amp (using the 4 Ohm tap). Do the Quads have some wild impedance swings that make them unsuited even for push-pull amps?
It is not extrme difficult to drive, but it is not that high either. It is not the fastest in response. That is why you need speed to get a more controlled low freq.
Two things I would suggest.

Spread the speakers a little further apart, you have more real estate there to play with.

Consider the purchase of a good tube amp. This alone will give you more body and 3 dimensional sound over the Rotel amp.

Shakey