50 years of Hip Hop- How Come?

@ghasley nice. I was think the same thing  

@jasonbourne52 cool. Please post a vid of you mc'ing with a boombox and a mic. I mean, if it's that easy, any idiot can do it, right?

@ghasley - yes, I especially smiled thinking of all the people who will have gotten bent out of shape by it. I quite enjoyed it, though being unfamiliar with most of her stuff, not as much as I should have, but that's on me. 

Not a fan at all.

But my dislike is based purely on the music itself.

I tend to only like music that has most or all of the following attributes:

Very high levels of musicianship, musical complexity, deep and broad range of emotional and/or intellectual content, sophisticated compositions and arrangements, avoidance of verse>chorus>bridge>repeat song structure.

Hip hop has none of the above. But neither does most pop or country, which I dislike about as much.

Early on, rap was much more political in nature. It was one of the only outlets repressed people had to make their reality known. From that perspective, I can respect it. 

But musically, it sucks, IMO.

@ghasley 

You want to hear an almost perfect belnding of all of these genres (soul, r&b, jazz, blues, funk, rap, hip-hop) then listen to Robert Glasper’s “Black Radio” albums. His latest “Black Radio III” is brilliant. The musicianship is exceptional. To those who haven’t ever heard someone rap melodically, it exists on this album. To those who swear those creating hip-hop or rap aren’t musicians, this album dispels the stupidity of that myth.

But the parts of Glsaper's recordings that display musicianship, is the jazz influenced portions. 

Steve Coleman, Andrew Milne, and others in the M-Base subgenre of jazz have been utilizing rap vocals for decades. Yet, they are not hip hop or rap recordings.

Steve Coleman is a near genius of contemporary jazz, and I own almost all of his 20+ recordings. Quite a few have hip hop type vocals, yet, I would argue that none of them are hip hop.