....while drilling about for details and examples of omni approaches of the past and present to put some sense into my Walsh project, I ran into this:
http://www.roger-russell.com/omni/omni.htm#onea
If you shortcut to the Hegeman 1a and the Eico portions, these ’whizzer variants’ were simple enough for me to half-tush a pair diy out of curiosity.
Surprisingly enough for something so simple to accomplish, it’s interesting to make a whizzer cone respond in an omni fashion, albeit vaguely directional.
If the slant of the cone is handled in ’sweet spot’ fashion, it works.
The hardest part is ’rolling’ a cone with a 45 deg. angle in a lightweight enough material to not hinder the drivers employed, but...
No static 'over driver' cones. either.....and not as effective as a full Walsh omni driver. but cheap thrills on the quick. *G*
It’s (imho) the only application of a whizzer cone that actually makes a difference.
That, and the patent filed for the method predates the original Ohm/Walsh patent, which makes one wonder....🤷♂️
Forward, into the past....*L*