@auroravengeance yes, I agree Denafriqs and Musician are basically the same design, But different voicing though. Musician also use better part inside which is why I prefer the Musician. But, I imagine I would be more than happy with the May or Denafriqs.
- ...
- 85 posts total
@viethluu I think you are incorrect on the Musician Aquarius using better parts than the Denafrips Terminator. The Aquarius uses Femto Clocks the Terminator a very high quality OCXO That's a bit difference in part quality. There is no way a their Femto clocks will come close the the OCXO clocks. Additionally the Terminator has separate power supplies for the digital and analog sections. I see only one transformer in the Aquarius. The clock and power supply are critical for a DAC's performance, Denafrips does it better. You get what you pay for. The Terminator plus is almost twice the cost of the Aquarius. Reviews note the Aquarius is a bit lean in the bass probably accounting for the brightness. The Terminator is know for the deep clean low end.
|
@anzaanimalclinic You put word into my mouth! I would never compared the Aquarius to the Terminator. They are belonging to a different leagues. The Aquarius can only be compared to lower tier of Denafriqs DAC. Having said that, have you ever heard the Terminator and the Aquarius in person? |
I just recently replaced my Qutest because I felt it was bright on extended listening sessions. I now have a Musician Pegasus and find it to be just the improvement I was looking for. I know it was not expensive but it's a great sounding r2r dac. My system consists of the following. Rogue Audio RP-7 preamp Parasound JC1 monoblocks Focal Kanta 2 speakers Optical Rendue streamer, Antipodes Server. |
- 85 posts total

