They made music because they were paid to whether by church or as often nobility. For money, the definition of commercial. No one else could afford such frivolities to commission work. However, it was also consumed by the masses .. so popular and commercial though of what competition I can’t speak.
You are beside the main point...
There ALWAYS existed commercial aspect to any activities in all centuries..It is a common place fact...
But my point was that commercial music consumerism is a late affair... It is born AFTER playback system of Charles Cros and Edison...
Popular music of the past is not commercial music in the modern sense of the word...
Popular dont equal commercial in music culture....
In the past music was an education toward spirit and religious matter or toward beauty and superior values... This word "beauty" is cancelled today....
This dont exist no more in commercial music...
Nowadays Bob Dylan is a popular poet for example not a commercial object first and last...
If you say to Dylan that he is merely a commercial product , he will be insulted...
If you say that to some commercial artists they will be glad and will try to improve their packaging and they will ask you how to do it better....
Then saying that Vivaldi one hundred operas were "commercial" music is not true...
Popular yes... Commercial not....We cannot read the past projecting onto it retrospectively our own categories sorry...Historians wrote entire books about this error only....

