What defines mid-fi versus high-end?


I’m in my mid fifties and I recall 30 years back mid-fi to me fell into the NAD, Adcom, B&K…. For high-end I considered Mac, some of the Counterpoint offerings, Cary…. so forth.  I had another post going where I mentioned I acquired an Onkyo  home theater receiver that retailed new for $1,100.   Yet another agoner responded that it does not rate as mid-fi.   We all have our opinions of course.   So right or wrong here.
How do you define the parameters of high-end versus mid-if?  By money range, by brand…?

 

pdspecl

When à product  gives as possible the real sound as the recording : than we speak about high-end. ! Does it means The price of the equipment :: no !  P.ex.: The Ear Yoshino 509, VAC, Zanden… gave à pure sound ! That’s high-end for me .

High-fi / Mid-fi : steps to archieve à higher  level of qualtty..  But to each his own pleasure and fun. An amplifier very good coloered with à “clock” in the front and very expensive (heard him several times). Is mid-fi for me : why?  You don’t approach the authenticiteit and puriteinse of the music…. But it will be different for everyone.  Enjoyed what “you” like !

Your own belief about what you have.  There is no universal definition.

One man's mid-fi is another's hi-end.  And vice-versa.

What difference does it make, if you love your system it doesn't matter if it cost $1,000 or 1,000,000 . And if Bose 901's are involved...