Is this Klipsch upgrade worth it?


I presently own a pair of Klipsch Forte lV's. Now I'm thinking about a pair of Cornwall lV's. Is this a worthy upgrade? Hope to hear from Goners that have experience with both. 
coachpoconnor
Not sure just how much better the Forte IV is over the III. I owned the IIIs for a while and thought they were very good. Moved on to Klipschorns then to Spatials. Came back to horns with the CW IV. My opinion is that it is definitely worth upgrading to.

I now own LaScala IIs and they were a very nice upgrade from the CW IV.

Oz


Oz.. that's interesting, the Spatials were one of the speakers I was considering originally.
I liked the proportion of the Cornwall lV's but was scared to shell out the additional dough because I didn't know whether I'd like the sound of horns.
The Forte lV's, to sound optimal, need to be moved into the room. I was wondering whether the CW's could sit closer to the wall in my room... and sound good there.
My supposition is Cornwall would be better in a few ways, slight extension, and a bit tighter imaging. Apply ’slightly better’ to EVERYTHING you listen to, that’s a LOT.

I haven’t heard Klipsch in years.

Cornwall has 15" woofer, front ports, no rear port or radiator.

The Forte has 12" woofer and 15" rear passive radiator.

My speakers are similar to the Cornwall: horns with 15" woofer, (mine: no front or rear port* or passive radiator).

Note the specs for Cornwall bass is a little lower, and the range is tighter +/- 3db, the Forte is +/- 4db.

*I actually have a rear port, now closed, I used it open in another space with no rear wall. Better closed here.

some placement ... info here

https://www.audioadvice.com/videos-reviews/klipsch-cornwall-iv-speaker-review/
I had the Cornwalls placed about 20" from the front wall. Closer was fine too, but was the placement I found optimal in my room.

Oz